Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Linux Based Receivers
Linux Receivers General
Which E2 receiver for best tuner sensitivity?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="moonbase" data-source="post: 1063520" data-attributes="member: 178786"><p>Update:</p><p></p><p>I installed the SatDream image on the Nino Pro and repeated the T2-M1 test for the same two transponders of 3887L and 4000L on 40.5W in C band. This time I got the pixelated image result reported by "scopus" in his earlier post.</p><p></p><p>My findings with the Nino Pro for T2-M1 tests in C band from 40.5W are that it does not yield a picture with any image other than SatDream and even that is pixelated. There are no T2-M1 pictures with OpenATV, OpenPLi and OpenVIX images. I have not done any tests yet in Ku band so I cannot comment on the functionality of the Nino Pro with T2-M1 in Ku band.</p><p></p><p>The pixelation for the two channels was not due to signal level, for both channels I had a stable lock and was comfortably above the threshold required for a lock as can be seen from the SNR dB levels in the pictures below.</p><p></p><p>A few test pictures are attached below.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]121191[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]121192[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]121193[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]121194[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]121195[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]121196[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="moonbase, post: 1063520, member: 178786"] Update: I installed the SatDream image on the Nino Pro and repeated the T2-M1 test for the same two transponders of 3887L and 4000L on 40.5W in C band. This time I got the pixelated image result reported by "scopus" in his earlier post. My findings with the Nino Pro for T2-M1 tests in C band from 40.5W are that it does not yield a picture with any image other than SatDream and even that is pixelated. There are no T2-M1 pictures with OpenATV, OpenPLi and OpenVIX images. I have not done any tests yet in Ku band so I cannot comment on the functionality of the Nino Pro with T2-M1 in Ku band. The pixelation for the two channels was not due to signal level, for both channels I had a stable lock and was comfortably above the threshold required for a lock as can be seen from the SNR dB levels in the pictures below. A few test pictures are attached below. [ATTACH=full]121191[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]121192[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]121193[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]121194[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]121195[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]121196[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Linux Based Receivers
Linux Receivers General
Which E2 receiver for best tuner sensitivity?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top