G-Sat at 93.5*E

shawl_who

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2015
Messages
361
Reaction score
297
Points
63
Age
36
My Satellite Setup
SES7, Yahsat 1A, Yamal 54.9e, express am33 @103e, eutelsat 36b
My Location
New Delhi, India
yeah.. I thought it was on southern beam, which had better coverage in europe.
but south asia beam is quite far from europe.
 

satesco

Specialist Contributor
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
2,024
Reaction score
2,834
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
seven antennas,one toroidal with 16 lnbs,
6 satellite receivers,2 Meters,9 PC cards(tbs6983,6903,6590,6504,6522,6209,2603,6909X,6903X,6902se,skystar hd2),2 tuners usb-tbs5927 & tbs5925,Skystar HD.
Satellite reception between 100.5E-50.0W
My Location
Romania
I revisited the 93.5E position in C-band with the 1.50cm antenna and I can say that there are no reception problems in my area even though the elevation is low.As long as the Indians still use the QPSK/2 modulation, there is a good chance that even with small antennas the signal can be locked on this satellite.The C-band is more favorable for reception in Europe than in Ku-band.
 

Attachments

  • 93.5E_3700-4200 HV_2021-06-15_20-20-11.png
    93.5E_3700-4200 HV_2021-06-15_20-20-11.png
    137.1 KB · Views: 17
  • 93.5E-AltDVB_2021-06-14_23-20-42.png
    93.5E-AltDVB_2021-06-14_23-20-42.png
    849.7 KB · Views: 13

satesco

Specialist Contributor
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
2,024
Reaction score
2,834
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
seven antennas,one toroidal with 16 lnbs,
6 satellite receivers,2 Meters,9 PC cards(tbs6983,6903,6590,6504,6522,6209,2603,6909X,6903X,6902se,skystar hd2),2 tuners usb-tbs5927 & tbs5925,Skystar HD.
Satellite reception between 100.5E-50.0W
My Location
Romania
As in previous years, reception at 93.5 E in Ku-band is only possible on the Horizontal polarity in my area, of course, only a few muxes.
Reception with 1.50E antenna.
 

Attachments

  • 11460 H_2022-09-22_19-49.png
    11460 H_2022-09-22_19-49.png
    475.3 KB · Views: 7
  • 11400-11700 H__2022-09-22_20-38.png
    11400-11700 H__2022-09-22_20-38.png
    87.5 KB · Views: 7
  • 93.5E-11400-11700 H_2022-09-22_19-21-40.png
    93.5E-11400-11700 H_2022-09-22_19-21-40.png
    56.5 KB · Views: 4
  • 11549 H,29500,34-2022-09-22_19-24-21.png
    11549 H,29500,34-2022-09-22_19-24-21.png
    119.9 KB · Views: 4
  • 11478 H,14500,34-2022-09-22_19-12-10.png
    11478 H,14500,34-2022-09-22_19-12-10.png
    201.2 KB · Views: 4
  • 11460 H,12500,56-2022-09-22_19-12-10.png
    11460 H,12500,56-2022-09-22_19-12-10.png
    651.9 KB · Views: 6

satesco

Specialist Contributor
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
2,024
Reaction score
2,834
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
seven antennas,one toroidal with 16 lnbs,
6 satellite receivers,2 Meters,9 PC cards(tbs6983,6903,6590,6504,6522,6209,2603,6909X,6903X,6902se,skystar hd2),2 tuners usb-tbs5927 & tbs5925,Skystar HD.
Satellite reception between 100.5E-50.0W
My Location
Romania
I revisited position 93.5E( #22,above), but this time for C-band reception. And even if my antenna(1.50m) is in a "toxic" environment, as seen in the picture, it can still pick up and lock transponders from the Indian beam.
I used an old MTI lnb(21K) from the '90s, Taiwan(with filter), and a Mediastar 5G filter with a Noise Figure of 15°. Neither one fully block interference between 3700-3800 MHz at 5.0° elevation.
I used Deeptho's neumoDVB application on Linux, which works well with the tbs6903x or 6902se cards.
 

Attachments

  • neumoDVB_2022-10-06_00-02_1.png
    neumoDVB_2022-10-06_00-02_1.png
    540 KB · Views: 6
  • AltDVB-2022-10-05_23-07-31.png
    AltDVB-2022-10-05_23-07-31.png
    649.8 KB · Views: 3
  • 2022-10-06_00-29.png
    2022-10-06_00-29.png
    209.6 KB · Views: 6
  • 93.5E_3700-4200 HV_2022-10-06_15-27-06.png
    93.5E_3700-4200 HV_2022-10-06_15-27-06.png
    125.3 KB · Views: 5
  • 1.50 dish beside the others.jpg
    1.50 dish beside the others.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 7
  • Mediastar_3700-4200 H_Mediastar 5G lnb__2022-10-07_10-52-16.png
    Mediastar_3700-4200 H_Mediastar 5G lnb__2022-10-07_10-52-16.png
    120.1 KB · Views: 11

satesco

Specialist Contributor
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
2,024
Reaction score
2,834
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
seven antennas,one toroidal with 16 lnbs,
6 satellite receivers,2 Meters,9 PC cards(tbs6983,6903,6590,6504,6522,6209,2603,6909X,6903X,6902se,skystar hd2),2 tuners usb-tbs5927 & tbs5925,Skystar HD.
Satellite reception between 100.5E-50.0W
My Location
Romania
I am revisiting the 93.5E G-Sat 17 position after a long time because this time, I am using the Titanium C-138 5G Red 1, 3.8-4.2GHz band, NF 15° with 1.50m antenna, installed next to a "forest" of mobile antennas.
And yet, despite this toxic environment, the signal is receivable and locked in C-band with this lnb, and my system is at an elevation of 2.68° with a slightly fluctuating signal.
Because the working band starts at 3.8GHz rather than 3830 MHz, and despite slight signal oscillation, the signal remains locked on almost all muxes.
So I didn't notice a significant change in reception at 93.5E in C-band even though I used this 5G lnb with filter compared to last year's experiences; it just narrowed the working bandwidth.
 

Attachments

  • 3770-4200 H)2024-06-04_12-40-05.png
    3770-4200 H)2024-06-04_12-40-05.png
    75.3 KB · Views: 7
  • 3800-4200 V_2024-06-04_12-35-33.png
    3800-4200 V_2024-06-04_12-35-33.png
    61 KB · Views: 7
  • 93°5E_2406041426_3800-4200 H .jpg
    93°5E_2406041426_3800-4200 H .jpg
    256.4 KB · Views: 7
  • 93°5E_2406041426.jpg
    93°5E_2406041426.jpg
    321.9 KB · Views: 9
  • 4075 V,12500,89,8psk-2024-06-04_12-33-47.png
    4075 V,12500,89,8psk-2024-06-04_12-33-47.png
    491.3 KB · Views: 7
  • DDK Bhopal_2024-06-04_14-24-02.png
    DDK Bhopal_2024-06-04_14-24-02.png
    943.5 KB · Views: 8
Top