Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Satellite Systems - What to Buy - What to install
Thinking of a new technomate box
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ymttt" data-source="post: 1117321" data-attributes="member: 414527"><p>I have this week tested three receivers against tm 5402 hd m3. The receivers are Starsat 200hd extreme, octagon sf8008 and the Ax60 4k. The test was done on 26 east with transponder 11270 v 27500. Each of the three receivers held the signal while the technomate failed. However, among the three named receivers when compared side by side there was no significant difference in term of tuner sensitivity. It has been posted elsewhere in this forum by Gladstones that the Xcruiser 785 has a better tuner over the Octagon sf8008. I have also read from a Pakistani forum where the sensitivity of the Xcruiser has been hailed but someone posted that the Formuler S turbo has a better tuner over the Xcruiser on his test. For those of us who are concerned with tuner sensitivity, it is important we compared the sensitivity of the Formuler and the Xcruiser to ascertain which of the two has a better tuner.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ymttt, post: 1117321, member: 414527"] I have this week tested three receivers against tm 5402 hd m3. The receivers are Starsat 200hd extreme, octagon sf8008 and the Ax60 4k. The test was done on 26 east with transponder 11270 v 27500. Each of the three receivers held the signal while the technomate failed. However, among the three named receivers when compared side by side there was no significant difference in term of tuner sensitivity. It has been posted elsewhere in this forum by Gladstones that the Xcruiser 785 has a better tuner over the Octagon sf8008. I have also read from a Pakistani forum where the sensitivity of the Xcruiser has been hailed but someone posted that the Formuler S turbo has a better tuner over the Xcruiser on his test. For those of us who are concerned with tuner sensitivity, it is important we compared the sensitivity of the Formuler and the Xcruiser to ascertain which of the two has a better tuner. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Satellite Systems - What to Buy - What to install
Thinking of a new technomate box
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top