- Joined
- Jan 1, 2000
- Messages
- 35,626
- Reaction score
- 8,587
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 59
- Website
- www.sat-elite.uk
- My Satellite Setup
- A little less analogue, and a lot more crap.
- My Location
- UK
A question on redundancy and future use.
I'm looking at two cameras sitting here with various lenses, taking up more space than they should.
The Canon SLR camera was a purchase a short while ago, simply because it came with a Canon 70-210 lens which - on paper - than the one for the DSLR, which is a Tamron 70-300. I also have the original 18-55 lens that is OK, but nothing special.
The DSLR, a Rebel XT (EOS 350D) with 8MP sensor is old but performs flawlessly, the only thing it cannot do is take movies, which is where the iPod comes in to its own.
So I have a Canon EOS650 doing nothing but collect dust and a spare lens. Is it something of no interest these days, or is there still a small market for mid-range cameras using 35mm film ?
I'm looking at two cameras sitting here with various lenses, taking up more space than they should.
The Canon SLR camera was a purchase a short while ago, simply because it came with a Canon 70-210 lens which - on paper - than the one for the DSLR, which is a Tamron 70-300. I also have the original 18-55 lens that is OK, but nothing special.
The DSLR, a Rebel XT (EOS 350D) with 8MP sensor is old but performs flawlessly, the only thing it cannot do is take movies, which is where the iPod comes in to its own.
So I have a Canon EOS650 doing nothing but collect dust and a spare lens. Is it something of no interest these days, or is there still a small market for mid-range cameras using 35mm film ?