Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vipersan" data-source="post: 803712" data-attributes="member: 325666">...Ok ..further to my first test with the F3 looped from the F15...I didn't think the test was fair ..since it has been reported by Pete that the F15 acts to surpress some of the signal to second looped box ..So In fairness to the F3 I connected it directly to the lnb ..but through the same 16 way cascade Diseqc 1.1 switch the F15 has to use ..The results were much better ..but sill less than the F15 (as expected) but does allow the F3 to perform as well as its tuner can..Same satellite ..same time taken to complete a full blindscan..but now reports 120 channels found ..So I can only conclude that the F3 used as a primary box in a system performs reasonably well...Certainly for a nice addition for £50The menu change responses to remote control presses are more sluggish than I would like ..so patience required during setup.I'll test it driving a usals motor this evening ..in kurgdsVS</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vipersan, post: 803712, member: 325666"] ...Ok ..further to my first test with the F3 looped from the F15... I didn't think the test was fair ..since it has been reported by Pete that the F15 acts to surpress some of the signal to second looped box .. So In fairness to the F3 I connected it directly to the lnb ..but through the same 16 way cascade Diseqc 1.1 switch the F15 has to use .. The results were much better ..but sill less than the F15 (as expected) but does allow the F3 to perform as well as its tuner can.. Same satellite ..same time taken to complete a full blindscan.. but now reports 120 channels found .. So I can only conclude that the F3 used as a primary box in a system performs reasonably well... Certainly for a nice addition for £50 The menu change responses to remote control presses are more sluggish than I would like ..so patience required during setup. I'll test it driving a usals motor this evening ..in ku rgds VS [/QUOTE]

Verification