Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="moonbase" data-source="post: 1155803" data-attributes="member: 178786">I'm back&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool&nbsp; &nbsp; :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" />Still not enough signal level to lock 12149 L here in Surrey, UK.At the moment the Dr HD F15 signal level indicator is between 7.0dB and 7.2dB which is 0.7dB less than the theoretical lock level. It might pick up a little in the evening and if the low grey cloud clears?I tried the SMW polariser in two different orientations with respect to the LNB probes.With the plate of the polariser bisecting the 90 degree angle of the LNB probes the polarities register correctly.With the plate of the polariser rotated 90 degrees from the bisection orientation the polarities are reversed and incorrect, signal level approxinately the same on both orientations.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="moonbase, post: 1155803, member: 178786"] I'm back :cool: Still not enough signal level to lock 12149 L here in Surrey, UK. At the moment the Dr HD F15 signal level indicator is between 7.0dB and 7.2dB which is 0.7dB less than the theoretical lock level. It might pick up a little in the evening and if the low grey cloud clears? I tried the SMW polariser in two different orientations with respect to the LNB probes. With the plate of the polariser bisecting the 90 degree angle of the LNB probes the polarities register correctly. With the plate of the polariser rotated 90 degrees from the bisection orientation the polarities are reversed and incorrect, signal level approxinately the same on both orientations. [/QUOTE]

Verification