Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="John" data-source="post: 966092" data-attributes="member: 175005">[ATTACH=full]91855[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]91854[/ATTACH] @peeter ...&nbsp; this info is for a CM 1.8 offset,&nbsp; using a ADL / AVComm poloriser barrel into a JRC extended C-band lnb&nbsp; located just north of Nottingham UK and looking at the East Hemi footprint.Just as Feedsat reported, 4544 RHC just does not quite lock with 8.1 dB and just needs a bit more ,&nbsp; the weather here has been overcast all day and might have a very very slight effect.&nbsp;&nbsp; I will continue to monitor RHC for a few days and document dB levels.Receiver choice has an effect as well,&nbsp; my TBS6983 pc card did not capture as much as my Amiko A3 did.&nbsp; I will try another receiver as well like the TM5402 HD Mk3.The difference in levels from LHC to RHC can be seen in the analyser grabs.[ATTACH=full]91850[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]91850[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]91852[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]91853[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="John, post: 966092, member: 175005"] [ATTACH=full]91855[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]91854[/ATTACH] @peeter ... this info is for a CM 1.8 offset, using a ADL / AVComm poloriser barrel into a JRC extended C-band lnb located just north of Nottingham UK and looking at the East Hemi footprint. Just as Feedsat reported, 4544 RHC just does not quite lock with 8.1 dB and just needs a bit more , the weather here has been overcast all day and might have a very very slight effect. I will continue to monitor RHC for a few days and document dB levels. Receiver choice has an effect as well, my TBS6983 pc card did not capture as much as my Amiko A3 did. I will try another receiver as well like the TM5402 HD Mk3. The difference in levels from LHC to RHC can be seen in the analyser grabs. [ATTACH=full]91850[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]91850[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]91852[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]91853[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification