Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="moonbase" data-source="post: 1134351" data-attributes="member: 178786">+1, agreed 100%I have attached below a small table I created a year or two ago where I was checking out 43.1W in C-Band. I think the table might also be uploaded into the 43.1W topic?As can be seen, the maximum signal levels for a few frequencies from the satellite were all achieved with different combinations of the feed distance from the dish and the scalar along the feed barrel.In the below table the maximum signal level per frequency tested is shaded in green.The feed rim aperture distances from the dish were 745mm, 750mm and 755mm.The scalar distances along the feed barrel were measured as the distance from the feed rim aperture to the dish facing side of the scalar and are listed in the first column of each mini table.This trend is applicable to most C-Band satellites I have tested from my UK location..[ATTACH=full]144564[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="moonbase, post: 1134351, member: 178786"] +1, agreed 100% I have attached below a small table I created a year or two ago where I was checking out 43.1W in C-Band. I think the table might also be uploaded into the 43.1W topic? As can be seen, the maximum signal levels for a few frequencies from the satellite were all achieved with different combinations of the feed distance from the dish and the scalar along the feed barrel. In the below table the maximum signal level per frequency tested is shaded in green. The feed rim aperture distances from the dish were 745mm, 750mm and 755mm. The scalar distances along the feed barrel were measured as the distance from the feed rim aperture to the dish facing side of the scalar and are listed in the first column of each mini table. This trend is applicable to most C-Band satellites I have tested from my UK location. . [ATTACH type="full" alt="43.1W_Feed_Scalar.jpg"]144564[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification