Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="John" data-source="post: 1143226" data-attributes="member: 175005"><p>Sounds like your surrounded with the things Simon - i'm pretty sure looking at web data that i just have the one 5G tower about a 1/4 mile away but the thing is more or less in direct line of sight when the Cband dish is pointed from about 40.5°W to 71°W.&nbsp; &nbsp; At the moment anything from 40.5°W going Eastwards is escaping the problem but no doubt it will change .&nbsp; &nbsp; I'm trialing double 5G filtering at the moment using an AliEx External 5G filter coupled onto cheap Chinese 5G lnb's but i'm still struggling with a 5G signal at 3.685GHz even through 2 x filters&nbsp; which i think one of the reasons is that the stop band of the filters is just not quite in the right place&nbsp; for want of a better description and it's letting a chunk of 3.685GHz through the net.&nbsp;&nbsp; I could use a filter that does cover the unwanted frequency but at the cost of limiting the receive fx band to 3.8GHz upwards.&nbsp;&nbsp; Myself and moonbase were saying recently that the present channel structure frequencies will be shunted further up band if possible and possibly also into the 4.5-4.8GHz part of the band if uplink / downlink equipment and the rest will allow it.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="John, post: 1143226, member: 175005"] Sounds like your surrounded with the things Simon - i'm pretty sure looking at web data that i just have the one 5G tower about a 1/4 mile away but the thing is more or less in direct line of sight when the Cband dish is pointed from about 40.5°W to 71°W. At the moment anything from 40.5°W going Eastwards is escaping the problem but no doubt it will change . I'm trialing double 5G filtering at the moment using an AliEx External 5G filter coupled onto cheap Chinese 5G lnb's but i'm still struggling with a 5G signal at 3.685GHz even through 2 x filters which i think one of the reasons is that the stop band of the filters is just not quite in the right place for want of a better description and it's letting a chunk of 3.685GHz through the net. I could use a filter that does cover the unwanted frequency but at the cost of limiting the receive fx band to 3.8GHz upwards. Myself and moonbase were saying recently that the present channel structure frequencies will be shunted further up band if possible and possibly also into the 4.5-4.8GHz part of the band if uplink / downlink equipment and the rest will allow it. [/QUOTE]

Verification