Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="a33" data-source="post: 1075472" data-attributes="member: 332642">To which I obviously don't count? <img src="https://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" data-shortname=":)" />As you probably have read in the eutelsat documents, diseqc has a &quot;bus protocol&quot;, and therefore can be used parallel and serial, which they described also. As I wrote:So the &quot;everywhere, immediately&quot; is not important.When a diseqc switch gets power, first the &quot;default port&quot; (1 or A) is chosen, and only after that a relevant switching command is executed.The non-targetted LNBs don't need to get a command or a voltage, as they are not targetted.Only some 22kHz (e.g. from Ecoda) switches (common in USA) pass diseqc commands and power permanently; diseqc switches do NOT.Examples of 'nonconventional' diseqc setups:receiver - diseqc1.1 UC1 - diseqc1.1 UC3/4 - diseqc1.0 - LNBs in <a href="https://www.sat4all.com/forums/topic/347884-diseqc-20-lnbs-schakelen/?do=findComment&amp;comment=2329272" target="_blank">DISEqC, 20 lnb's schakelen</a>parallel use of diseqc 1.0 in <a href="https://www.sat4all.com/forums/topic/343724-parallel-schakelen-van-diseqc-switches/" target="_blank">Parallel schakelen van diseqc switches</a>I believe [USER=325666]@Vipersan[/USER] also used diseqc 1.0 and 1.1 parallel, or in the nonconventional order. Its in this forum, and was at that time an inspriration to me to investigate diseqc protocol further. <img src="https://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" data-shortname=":)" />Cannot find an easy link though; he posted too much.... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite53" alt=":confused" title="Confused&nbsp; &nbsp; :confused" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":confused" />I've not seen the order receiver - committed switch - uncommitted switch - LNBs used often in forums, but the few times I've seen it, I've always liked the creativity and nonconventionality of it!greetz,A33Edit: added a bit.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="a33, post: 1075472, member: 332642"] To which I obviously don't count? :):) As you probably have read in the eutelsat documents, diseqc has a "[B]bus protocol[/B]", and therefore can be used parallel and serial, which they described also. As I wrote: So the "everywhere, immediately" is not important. When a diseqc switch gets power, first the "default port" (1 or A) is chosen, and only after that a relevant switching command is executed. The non-targetted LNBs don't need to get a command or a voltage, as they are not targetted. Only some 22kHz (e.g. from Ecoda) switches (common in USA) pass diseqc commands and power permanently; diseqc switches do NOT. Examples of 'nonconventional' diseqc setups: receiver - diseqc1.1 UC1 - diseqc1.1 UC3/4 - diseqc1.0 - LNBs in [URL='https://www.sat4all.com/forums/topic/347884-diseqc-20-lnbs-schakelen/?do=findComment&comment=2329272']DISEqC, 20 lnb's schakelen[/URL] parallel use of diseqc 1.0 in [URL='https://www.sat4all.com/forums/topic/343724-parallel-schakelen-van-diseqc-switches/']Parallel schakelen van diseqc switches[/URL] I believe [USER=325666]@Vipersan[/USER] also used diseqc 1.0 and 1.1 parallel, or in the nonconventional order. Its in this forum, and was at that time an inspriration to me to investigate diseqc protocol further. :) Cannot find an easy link though; he posted too much.... :confused I've not seen the order receiver - committed switch - uncommitted switch - LNBs used often in forums, but the few times I've seen it, I've always liked the creativity and nonconventionality of it! greetz, A33 [I]Edit: added a bit.[/I] [/QUOTE]

Verification