Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Satellite Systems - What to Buy - What to install
All digital is not always good
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="2old4this" data-source="post: 4588" data-attributes="member: 174998"><p>(I've moved the thread here from the Sky Digital forum since the subject matter is not Sky-related)</p><p></p><p>Digital trasnmission is more robust (more tolerant of transmission errors) but the problem is providers try to squeeze in too many channels into a particular digital frequency/transponder. The blocking artefacts arise even under ideal transmission/reception conditions because the amount of information transmitted exceeds the available "bandwidth", so that much more compression is needed. </p><p>Analogue transmissions under ideal conditions don't suffer such indignities but then you only get max 2 such channels per frequency (H & V) instead of up to 20 under digital.</p><p></p><p>So the artefacts are NOT due to the technology, but to the providers wishing to cram in as many channels as possible into their expensive transponder space...</p><p></p><p>The dishonest aspect is that providers advertise digital TV as being both crystal-clear AND offering many more channels. In reality, there is a trade off. </p><p></p><p>If you want an example of a consistently apalling digital signal watch watch BBC-Prime... </p><p></p><p>2old</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="2old4this, post: 4588, member: 174998"] (I've moved the thread here from the Sky Digital forum since the subject matter is not Sky-related) Digital trasnmission is more robust (more tolerant of transmission errors) but the problem is providers try to squeeze in too many channels into a particular digital frequency/transponder. The blocking artefacts arise even under ideal transmission/reception conditions because the amount of information transmitted exceeds the available "bandwidth", so that much more compression is needed. Analogue transmissions under ideal conditions don't suffer such indignities but then you only get max 2 such channels per frequency (H & V) instead of up to 20 under digital. So the artefacts are NOT due to the technology, but to the providers wishing to cram in as many channels as possible into their expensive transponder space... The dishonest aspect is that providers advertise digital TV as being both crystal-clear AND offering many more channels. In reality, there is a trade off. If you want an example of a consistently apalling digital signal watch watch BBC-Prime... 2old [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Satellite Systems - What to Buy - What to install
All digital is not always good
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top