Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Satellite Launches and Retirements
Arabsat BADR-8
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="moonbase" data-source="post: 1155208" data-attributes="member: 178786"><p>[USER=418349]@Beli1910[/USER]</p><p></p><p>We both come to the same conclusion, there is a 0.2 degree separation in azimuth required to get the frequencies at maximum signal level.</p><p>Some frequencies are maximised and others reduced in signal level if only one azimuth position is used.</p><p></p><p>It is easy to test, I created a list in a table of which frequencies I found to be impacted. If anyone wishes to test this the frequencies are presented in reply 323.</p><p>However, due to different geographic locations, anyone testing this might get different results depending on their location with respect to the beam footprint.</p><p></p><p>It is possible that some of the frequencies reported to have moved to Badr-8 have not moved.</p><p>People were saying a frequency had moved simply due to a variation in signal level, this might not be the case?</p><p></p><p>Only yesterday people were saying two more frequencies had moved from Badr-4 to Badr-8. This was not proven, it was an assumption. </p><p>Respected forum member [USER=193781]@william-1[/USER] was correct when he said there was no change and the signal levels for these two frequncies were unchanged for him.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="moonbase, post: 1155208, member: 178786"] [USER=418349]@Beli1910[/USER] We both come to the same conclusion, there is a 0.2 degree separation in azimuth required to get the frequencies at maximum signal level. Some frequencies are maximised and others reduced in signal level if only one azimuth position is used. It is easy to test, I created a list in a table of which frequencies I found to be impacted. If anyone wishes to test this the frequencies are presented in reply 323. However, due to different geographic locations, anyone testing this might get different results depending on their location with respect to the beam footprint. It is possible that some of the frequencies reported to have moved to Badr-8 have not moved. People were saying a frequency had moved simply due to a variation in signal level, this might not be the case? Only yesterday people were saying two more frequencies had moved from Badr-4 to Badr-8. This was not proven, it was an assumption. Respected forum member [USER=193781]@william-1[/USER] was correct when he said there was no change and the signal levels for these two frequncies were unchanged for him. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Satellite Launches and Retirements
Arabsat BADR-8
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top