Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Huevos" data-source="post: 832840" data-attributes="member: 301161">Try going back and reading the posts and scans from a scientific point of view, and forget about ramblings on Facebook pages or other nonsense posted on satellite websites.If you look at the scan posted by &quot;oldfart&quot; in the Canaries (post #294) you will see 1N spot (10700-10950) is an easy catch, as well as 1N PE beam (11005V &amp; 11185V), where as 12207V is down in the noise, i.e. it is not on either of those beams. 2F spot is also moderately strong on that scan and obviously a different beam too.Now compare that to the scan from &quot;strs65&quot; in Crete (post #299). 2F spot stronger than 1N spot. 1N PE stronger than 2F spot. And 12207V more powerful than all the beams mentioned so far and only exceeded by 2A South (12051V).My results from this location separate these beams in a similar way but the combination of signal levels is different again.So 12207V isn't any of the previous &amp; known beams, so can only be on a brand new one.Posts in the signal reports thread seem to confirm the above... now all we need is for Analoguesat to collate all those reports for 12207V and 12110H into a map so we can make sense of them.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Huevos, post: 832840, member: 301161"] Try going back and reading the posts and scans from a scientific point of view, and forget about ramblings on Facebook pages or other nonsense posted on satellite websites. If you look at the scan posted by "oldfart" in the Canaries (post #294) you will see 1N spot (10700-10950) is an easy catch, as well as 1N PE beam (11005V & 11185V), where as 12207V is down in the noise, i.e. it is not on either of those beams. 2F spot is also moderately strong on that scan and obviously a different beam too. Now compare that to the scan from "strs65" in Crete (post #299). 2F spot stronger than 1N spot. 1N PE stronger than 2F spot. And 12207V more powerful than all the beams mentioned so far and only exceeded by 2A South (12051V). My results from this location separate these beams in a similar way but the combination of signal levels is different again. So 12207V isn't any of the previous & known beams, so can only be on a brand new one. Posts in the signal reports thread seem to confirm the above... now all we need is for Analoguesat to collate all those reports for 12207V and 12110H into a map so we can make sense of them. [/QUOTE]

Verification