Best dish for C-Band

Pipedream

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
456
Reaction score
595
Points
93
Age
62
My Satellite Setup
0.9-1.2 & 2.2 precision dishes TM5402 mk3 TM5302 & V8 Golden
My Location
Sheffield
I have a 1.8 offset channel master and a 1.8 PF channel master, which would be the best for receiving C-band? I have just put a C-band LNB on the offset but not having too much luck with it at the moment. Picked up a few TP's on some sats but not too many.
 

Terryl

Specialist Contributor
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
3,486
Reaction score
2,061
Points
113
Age
83
My Satellite Setup
OpenBox X5 on a 1 meter motorized dish.
And now a 10 foot "C" band dish.

Custom built PC
My Location
Deep in the Boonies in the central Sierra Nevada mountains of California.
A 1.8 meter dish is a bit small for "C" band in some locations, you can go to satbeams.com and look at some of the footprints for your location, you select a satellite in the list and click on the little green globe, this will bring up a footprint map for that bird, the "C" band transponder stuff is all in the funny colored purple box(s) at the top of the page.

Once you select a satellite and it's "C" band beam you can zoom into your location and click on where the dish is located, this will give you an estimated dish size needed for a good error free signal on that bird for your location.
 

Captain Jack

Retired human
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
11,897
Reaction score
8,078
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
See signature
My Location
North Somerset
Can you post a few pictures of your setup?
 

beavs2112

Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
168
Reaction score
404
Points
63
Age
57
Location
Canada
My Satellite Setup
see signature
My Location
London, Ontario Canada
I have a 1.8 offset channel master and a 1.8 PF channel master, which would be the best for receiving C-band? I have just put a C-band LNB on the offset but not having too much luck with it at the moment. Picked up a few TP's on some sats but not too many.
@Pipedream. Sorry to hear of your poor c-band results. Do you have the correct scalar feedhorn for the offset dish? If you use a c-band lnbf on an offset dish you need the offset feedhorn ring to match. SSS has them in their feedhorn section. A couple of pictures of your feedhorn setup may help us help you improve your reception. I see CJ types faster than me.
 

RimaNTSS

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
5,684
Reaction score
6,182
Points
113
Age
59
My Satellite Setup
Some SAT-related hardware.
My Location
N-E from Riga
I have a 1.8 offset channel master and a 1.8 PF channel master, which would be the best for receiving C-band? I have just put a C-band LNB on the offset but not having too much luck with it at the moment. Picked up a few TP's on some sats but not too many.
Both antennas 1,8m, so if you using proper LNBs than performance should be more or less same (difference is not noticeable by simple means). I suspect you should spend more time tuning your antennas, using proper LNBs and better adjusting of them. Which satellites are you receiving? How many TPs are received? What are signal levels? E.t.c.?
 
A

archive10

Guest
I have a 1.8 offset channel master and a 1.8 PF channel master, which would be the best for receiving C-band? I have just put a C-band LNB on the offset but not having too much luck with it at the moment. Picked up a few TP's on some sats but not too many.
I'd dare to speculate that the PF would be easiest to fit a C band LNB on, as the offset CM180 has a 40 mm LNB holder which is not easily replaceable, whereas I would guess that your pf is, if not born with a c band size clamp, then at least easily modifiable.
As @RimaNTSS says the performance should be the same.
Pics would be great!
 

parkiepie420

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2012
Messages
155
Reaction score
269
Points
63
Age
45
My Satellite Setup
technomate tm-5402hd m3 /gibertini 1.25m sat dish 51e to 34w inverto black ultra single 0.2db lnb / titanium single output cband lnb
technomate tm-5402hd m3/triax 1.1m dish 53e to 24w inverto black ultra single 0.2 lnb
My Location
sheffield south yorkshire uk

Pipedream

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
456
Reaction score
595
Points
93
Age
62
My Satellite Setup
0.9-1.2 & 2.2 precision dishes TM5402 mk3 TM5302 & V8 Golden
My Location
Sheffield
Last edited:

Pipedream

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
456
Reaction score
595
Points
93
Age
62
My Satellite Setup
0.9-1.2 & 2.2 precision dishes TM5402 mk3 TM5302 & V8 Golden
My Location
Sheffield
I'd dare to speculate that the PF would be easiest to fit a C band LNB on, as the offset CM180 has a 40 mm LNB holder which is not easily replaceable, whereas I would guess that your pf is, if not born with a c band size clamp, then at least easily modifiable.
As @RimaNTSS says the performance should be the same.
Pics would be great!
As you say the offset has a 40mm LNB holder, I have clamped a 60mm holder behind the 40mm clamp, this restricts the movement both forwards and backwards with the LNB.
 

Pipedream

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
456
Reaction score
595
Points
93
Age
62
My Satellite Setup
0.9-1.2 & 2.2 precision dishes TM5402 mk3 TM5302 & V8 Golden
My Location
Sheffield
Both antennas 1,8m, so if you using proper LNBs than performance should be more or less same (difference is not noticeable by simple means). I suspect you should spend more time tuning your antennas, using proper LNBs and better adjusting of them. Which satellites are you receiving? How many TPs are received? What are signal levels? E.t.c.?
I am receiving
20 east
3933 V 27500 Q 82%
4053 V 27500 Q 87%
17 east
3933 V 27500 Q 81%
4019 V 20830 Q 70%
4053 V 27500 Q 87%
24 west Nothing
22 west Nothing
11 west Nothing
5 west
3731 V 11963 Q 36%
4114 V 2143 Q 65%
4128 V 3483 Q 68%
4137 V 2510 Q 65%
4154 V 2290 Q 77%
4159 V 1945 Q 65%
4162 V 1500 Q 76%
0.8 west Nothing
These were scanned last night using a TM 5302 I think it's a Western Digital LNB I am using it is one that has been kicking around in the garage for a couple of years.
 

Huevos

Satellite Freak
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
6,038
Reaction score
1,277
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
57E to 58W, C-band and Ku, DVB-S2, 4:2:2 and blindscan.
My Location
38.5ºN, 0.5ºW
If it is for multi LNB an offset dish is going to be superior due to the longer focal distance.
 

RimaNTSS

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
5,684
Reaction score
6,182
Points
113
Age
59
My Satellite Setup
Some SAT-related hardware.
My Location
N-E from Riga
I am receiving
And you receiving this with offset or PFA?
I did think your original question was:
I have a 1.8 offset channel master and a 1.8 PF channel master, which would be the best for receiving C-band?
Now it is only left to install another antenna and compare results.
Are we speaking about central (not multifeed) LNBs on both antennas?
 

RimaNTSS

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
5,684
Reaction score
6,182
Points
113
Age
59
My Satellite Setup
Some SAT-related hardware.
My Location
N-E from Riga
Sorry @Pipedream , I did not see pictures you added. Nice installation. I only think that side feedarms do not allow to place LNB properly. As you said: movement of LNB is restricted.
Could you post pictures with higher resolution please?
 

Pipedream

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
456
Reaction score
595
Points
93
Age
62
My Satellite Setup
0.9-1.2 & 2.2 precision dishes TM5402 mk3 TM5302 & V8 Golden
My Location
Sheffield
And you receiving this with offset or PFA?
I did think your original question was:

Now it is only left to install another antenna and compare results.
Are we speaking about central (not multifeed) LNBs on both antennas?
Only using the offset at the moment with single LNB
 

Pipedream

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
456
Reaction score
595
Points
93
Age
62
My Satellite Setup
0.9-1.2 & 2.2 precision dishes TM5402 mk3 TM5302 & V8 Golden
My Location
Sheffield
IMG_0454RS.jpg
Sorry @Pipedream , I did not see pictures you added. Nice installation. I only think that side feedarms do not allow to place LNB properly. As you said: movement of LNB is restricted.
Could you post pictures with higher resolution please?

These should be better, it will not let me upload original size photos
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0453RS.jpg
    IMG_0453RS.jpg
    902.4 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG_0456RS.jpg
    IMG_0456RS.jpg
    804.6 KB · Views: 28

Archived-1

Persona non grata
Joined
Apr 14, 2007
Messages
7,570
Reaction score
8,590
Points
113
My Location
uk
Are you scanning with plate in/out on the correct satellites, looking at the lnb it needs more skew for using the plate in if you are in Sheffield ? your ip suggests different ?
 

Pipedream

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
456
Reaction score
595
Points
93
Age
62
My Satellite Setup
0.9-1.2 & 2.2 precision dishes TM5402 mk3 TM5302 & V8 Golden
My Location
Sheffield
Are you scanning with plate in/out on the correct satellites, looking at the lnb it needs more skew for using the plate in if you are in Sheffield ? your ip suggests different ?
The plate is in. Which way would it require skewing? or would I be better replacing the LNB holder with this type?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0457RS.jpg
    IMG_0457RS.jpg
    805.8 KB · Views: 28

beavs2112

Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
168
Reaction score
404
Points
63
Age
57
Location
Canada
My Satellite Setup
see signature
My Location
London, Ontario Canada
I'd dare to speculate that the PF would be easiest to fit a C band LNB on, as the offset CM180 has a 40 mm LNB holder which is not easily replaceable, whereas I would guess that your pf is, if not born with a c band size clamp, then at least easily modifiable.
Thanks for the new pics. It looks like the feed is not in the right position and like you say movement is limited. I agree with st1. Without seeing your dish i'll say the PFA should be easier to fit an lnb to. A 1.8m PF Channel Master is a rare dish indeed (at least here in north America). I've only ever seen pics once. Does yours look like this rare 6 foot CM PF.jpg
 

Pipedream

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
456
Reaction score
595
Points
93
Age
62
My Satellite Setup
0.9-1.2 & 2.2 precision dishes TM5402 mk3 TM5302 & V8 Golden
My Location
Sheffield
Thanks for the new pics. It looks like the feed is not in the right position and like you say movement is limited. I agree with st1. Without seeing your dish i'll say the PFA should be easier to fit an lnb to. A 1.8m PF Channel Master is a rare dish indeed (at least here in north America). I've only ever seen pics once. Does yours look like this View attachment 86176
Apart from the LNB cover it is identical. I have the pole mount for it, it fits onto a 3.5" pole if I remember right
 

nelson_b

Contributor
Joined
Jul 27, 2008
Messages
1,985
Reaction score
2,075
Points
113
Age
74
My Satellite Setup
Strong 4375 driving a 2.4 m Channel Master dual focus offset + Invcom Quad C120 K/U l.n.b. + BSC 421 and Zinwell C band l.n.b.,s - DR HD F15 - TM5302 - Octagon SX88+Optima - GT Media V7 - HD receivers. + other dishes currently in use - Antique 3.0 m Prodelin P.F. - Channel Master 1.8 m offset - Channel Master. 1.2 m.
My Location
North West Yorkshire - near Lancashire & Cumbria borders.
hi -
as @RimaNTSS said i think the lnb. holder and side arms are stopping you being able to get the exact / correct position for the lnb and feed --- it is not so easy to setup on a 1.8 offset dish the side arms need to be wider and lower ... if the C band l.n.b. is sitting in the original k.u holder it will be a little to high --- have you tried lowering the dish elevation a bit to compensate for this -- it may help to improve things -- but a re- design of the way the side arms are fastened is the way to go on this dish --- i get pretty good results from mine with the C band l.n.b offset about 6 degrees and k/u in centre position

regards - nelson .b.
 
Last edited:
Top