Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="deeptho" data-source="post: 1132977" data-attributes="member: 215446">Well, With Adaptive or variable coding, you would expect this to occur.About the i2c bus: nothing can be done about it, with perhaps one theoretical exception: it is possible to put the chip in &quot;versatile tuner mode&quot;. Then it would be possible to read data at much higher rates and perform the spectrum analysison a PC. While the stid135 chip supports this, it it not clear at all if the card supports is. It would probably require somenew fpga firmware, and perhaps even a redesign or some soldering. It depends on how the board is wired.It would also allow things like the waterfall display, basically turning the card into a receiver for&nbsp; software defined radio(or in fact: 8 of those with a user-selectable capture bandwidth between 100kHz and 129Mhz, so pretty high specs which couldalso overload the pc)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="deeptho, post: 1132977, member: 215446"] Well, With Adaptive or variable coding, you would expect this to occur. About the i2c bus: nothing can be done about it, with perhaps one theoretical exception: it is possible to put the chip in "versatile tuner mode". Then it would be possible to read data at much higher rates and perform the spectrum analysis on a PC. While the stid135 chip supports this, it it not clear at all if the card supports is. It would probably require some new fpga firmware, and perhaps even a redesign or some soldering. It depends on how the board is wired. It would also allow things like the waterfall display, basically turning the card into a receiver for software defined radio (or in fact: 8 of those with a user-selectable capture bandwidth between 100kHz and 129Mhz, so pretty high specs which could also overload the pc) [/QUOTE]

Verification