Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tasoss" data-source="post: 1166353" data-attributes="member: 421167">I am glad! Really.How can you explain the fact that windows blind scanning using 6903x can find the frequencies that we are talking about and the linux version does not ? I mean does it have to do with the drivers(i don't mean that it's your fault)? I suppose the peak findingalgorithm that you are talking about is software based. So they may be missing something in Linux implementation.(I am asking out of curiosity)The sattellite is Eutelsat 16A at 16.0°E.I would like to ask you a question , in case there is no solution but to use neumodvb.How difficult is it to change stid135-blindscan in order to use your better algorithm ?I am in no way good in C/C++ but i could give it a try and maybe with some help to achieve it.Currently i am investigating the source code of neumodvb. You have created great stuff.Thanks again!ps: If you need access to the satellite please let me know.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tasoss, post: 1166353, member: 421167"] I am glad! Really. How can you explain the fact that windows blind scanning using 6903x can find the frequencies that we are talking about and the linux version does not ? I mean does it have to do with the drivers(i don't mean that it's your fault)? I suppose the peak finding algorithm that you are talking about is software based. So they may be missing something in Linux implementation.(I am asking out of curiosity) The sattellite is Eutelsat 16A at 16.0°E. I would like to ask you a question , in case there is no solution but to use neumodvb. How difficult is it to change stid135-blindscan in order to use your better algorithm ? I am in no way good in C/C++ but i could give it a try and maybe with some help to achieve it. Currently i am investigating the source code of neumodvb. You have created great stuff. Thanks again! ps: If you need access to the satellite please let me know. [/QUOTE]

Verification