Newbie Here blscan2 vs stid135-blindscan

[tasoss]

Hello and nice to meet you.
After purchasing a lot of 6903x we found out that blscan2 doesn't work.
Until now we have been using 6903 with blscan2 with great success(thanks @CrazyCat )
In general i prefer the Linux operating system. This was my only problem with blscan2 .
I would love to see crazycat's software running on Linux.

I am in the process of testing neumodvb vs blscan2 in order to choose how i will proceed.
I am trying to find out which is fastest and which is more accurate.
During my firsts tests ( at 16east) that i have performed i have seen something strange

time sudo stid135-blindscan -cblindscan -a0 -s 11700000 -e 12750000 --rf-in=0 -pH

S2 11736687 H 29999106 3/5 AUTO 8PSK
S2 11778190 H 29999129 3/5 AUTO 8PSK
S2 11807604 H 3332917 5/6 AUTO 8PSK
S2 11824718 H 5903848 0/0 AUTO QPSK
S2 11845675 H 5713868 0/1 AUTO AUTO
S2 11890638 H 2915913 3/4 AUTO AUTO
S2 12112187 H 29999180 2/3 AUTO 8PSK
S2 12236680 H 31999028 3/4 AUTO 8PSK
S2 12320686 H 29999164 3/4 AUTO 8PSK
S2 12362178 H 29999156 3/4 AUTO 8PSK
S2 12403684 H 29999199 3/4 AUTO 8PSK
S2 12445176 H 29999169 3/4 AUTO 8PSK
S2 12486677 H 29999198 5/6 AUTO 8PSK
S2 12528174 H 29999133 3/4 AUTO 8PSK

blscan2 results

S2 12506000 H 1585000 1/4 20 QPSK 0
S2 12533000 H 10830000 3/4 20 32APSK 0
S1 12563000 H 3702000 7/8 35 QPSK
S2 12639000 H 10830000 3/5 20 8PSK
S1 12674000 H 2928000 3/4 35 QPSK
S2 12682000 H 7423000 2/3 20 8PSK
S2 12693000 H 2221000 4/5 20 QPSK
S1 12700000 H 9878000 2/3 35 QPSK
S2 12718000 H 4999000 3/4 20 QPSK
S2 12724000 H 4099000 3/4 20 QPSK
S2 12730000 H 1697000 2/3 20 8PSK 0
S2 12734000 H 3779000 4/5 20 QPSK
S2 12742000 H 999000 2/3 20 QPSK

In other ranges(V and H) i haven't seen something like that until now.

I have scanned without getting any channels for the following transponders(contained only on stid135-blindscan's output, amongst other)

S2 11736687 H 29999106 3/5 AUTO 8PSK
S2 11778190 H 29999129 3/5 AUTO 8PSK
S2 11807604 H 3332917 5/6 AUTO 8PSK
S2 11824718 H 5903848 0/0 AUTO QPSK
S2 11845675 H 5713868 0/1 AUTO AUTO
S2 11890638 H 2915913 3/4 AUTO AUTO

So.
1) I was reading in this forum that neumo-blindscan(i suppose stid135-blindscan too) is not as reliable as neumodvb. So, does this mean that i have to use a GUI in order to have better results ???
2) I feel very safe using blscan2. I was reading that neumodvb feels more 'beta' software and there are no real differences in the results of blscan2 and neumo.
3) Keeping in mind that 6903 is not manufactured anymore what do you propose ?

Thanks!

ps: I have ordered an 6909x in order to test its parallel feature.