Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vipersan" data-source="post: 752776" data-attributes="member: 325666">Just checked Qwers pics again ..You'll notice he's using the F16 ...basically the same box ....but of course a much bigger dish ..so is getting a solid 13db+From this I can only assume whatever coutermeasure they are using restricts any receivers lock to the stronger ..intended footprint area ..unless you have an oversized dish to compensate.I'm guessing a weak signal with an intermittent pulse on the carrier ..plays havoc with the agc unless ..a signal over a predetermined level is aquired..Sort of makes sense..Creates a threshold ...and what is effectively a false fringe footprint._If_ what I'm suggesting holds any truth ...then theoretically ...a receiver with a less responsive agc...would allow the tuner to accomodate and hold the higher lever of gain for a long enough period to ignore the countermeasure.rgdsVS</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vipersan, post: 752776, member: 325666"] Just checked Qwers pics again .. You'll notice he's using the F16 ...basically the same box ....but of course a much bigger dish ..so is getting a solid 13db+ From this I can only assume whatever coutermeasure they are using restricts any receivers lock to the stronger ..intended footprint area ..unless you have an oversized dish to compensate. I'm guessing a weak signal with an intermittent pulse on the carrier ..plays havoc with the agc unless ..a signal over a predetermined level is aquired.. Sort of makes sense.. Creates a threshold ...and what is effectively a false fringe footprint. _If_ what I'm suggesting holds any truth ...then theoretically ...a receiver with a less responsive agc...would allow the tuner to accomodate and hold the higher lever of gain for a long enough period to ignore the countermeasure. rgds VS [/QUOTE]

Verification