C band multi lnb arm

dssnosher

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2011
Messages
41
Reaction score
10
Points
8
Age
44
My Satellite Setup
DM500
My Location
Ukraine
Greetings,

In the process of setting up a 300 cm mesh to receive Intelsat 17 @ 66E but also interested to receive Intelsat 20 @ 68.5E on the same dish.

Now the multi-lnb set up is quite easy with the KU band but for C based on my research it's a bit different. First two things that come into unknown is where to get the C band arm to attach a second lnb and what is the best practice setting up multi-lnb for C band.

Any insight and help would me very appreciated.
 

Vipersan

Emmett Browns Ghost
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
10,918
Reaction score
6,663
Points
113
Age
66
My Satellite Setup
IP9000HD +
TD110 Dish and TD88 Dish in Tandem
66°East to 60°West.
AZbox PrmHD + OpnbxS9HD + Skybox + DrHD F15
2x VboxII AZ-EL
2 m+ Alcoa PF + BSC421 C-Band lnbf...
+SS2/TwHnS2-3200 pci/TBS6925 pci
1.5 Fortec Star -Gbox - HtoH Ku/Ka/C
My Location
UK
On such a big dish something like this would be useful ..though finding a supplier might be tricky ..
China or India is yer best bet ..
They come in dual ..triple or quad flavours ..
rgds
VS
c band multi feed.jpg
 

Terryl

Specialist Contributor
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
3,466
Reaction score
2,047
Points
113
Age
82
My Satellite Setup
OpenBox X5 on a 1 meter motorized dish.
And now a 10 foot "C" band dish.

Custom built PC
My Location
Deep in the Boonies in the central Sierra Nevada mountains of California.
The big problems with a standard "C" band dish in trying to setup multiple LNB's on it is the fact that they don't have very good side to side reception.

An LNB mounted to the right or left of dead center may have signal problems, as the dishes focal area is round, (like the dish) and not elliptical, the dish would need to be shaped like a big radar dish (somewhat) to get usable signals to the side mounted LNB's, and I haven't seen one like that around for many many years.

This is why most are motorized to pan left or right.

Now I'm not saying that it may or may not work, you would have to test this by moving the dish ever so slightly left or right to see how far down your signal drops, take note of how far it can be moved to see how large a focal area you have with that dish, you may need to remove the Scala ring (if you can) to see this. as that is for side rejection of unwanted signals.

This may be why the setup posted by Vipersan does not have one.
 

Terryl

Specialist Contributor
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
3,466
Reaction score
2,047
Points
113
Age
82
My Satellite Setup
OpenBox X5 on a 1 meter motorized dish.
And now a 10 foot "C" band dish.

Custom built PC
My Location
Deep in the Boonies in the central Sierra Nevada mountains of California.
One other thing, I don't know if you can get the two "C" band LNB's close enough together to get two satellites spaced only 2.5 degrees apart, there may be some cutting of the sides of the LNB involved.
 

Vipersan

Emmett Browns Ghost
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
10,918
Reaction score
6,663
Points
113
Age
66
My Satellite Setup
IP9000HD +
TD110 Dish and TD88 Dish in Tandem
66°East to 60°West.
AZbox PrmHD + OpnbxS9HD + Skybox + DrHD F15
2x VboxII AZ-EL
2 m+ Alcoa PF + BSC421 C-Band lnbf...
+SS2/TwHnS2-3200 pci/TBS6925 pci
1.5 Fortec Star -Gbox - HtoH Ku/Ka/C
My Location
UK
DSCF0168.JPG DSCF0167.JPG ...As Terry says ..this is a problem with side by side grouping of C band lnbs at the focus of a PF dish ..
All is compromise ..
I built my own with cut scalar rings ...such that both lnbs could be as close as practical or possible ...
Neither occupies the 'sweet spot' ..but indeed ..share the focus ...which is actually between the 2 lnbs ...
Thus both lnbs are about 2 degrees off focus...
That's _my_ compromise..
cest la vie.
 
Top