Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="briangw" data-source="post: 892702" data-attributes="member: 290989">It's obvious that the signal has improved a lot over the last week, but looking back over the last 6 months or so using your graphs, it seems to me that, visually,&nbsp; the 2E signal has become more stable. There are less severe peaks and troughs, and the 2E signal line now looks a lot flatter, and comparable to 2F. Previously there was quite a considerable difference between the graph lines of the two sats, whereas now, although not in sync, they broadly look quite similar. Is it possible that they are bringing the daily wobble gradually under control ? Did 2F show something similar in its early days, and then finally settled down? Of course, this is just a visual impression, it would need access to the raw data of 2E to trace the highs, lows and averages during the whole period of your monitoring to see if there is a gradual improvement. Or is it just a seasonal blip ?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="briangw, post: 892702, member: 290989"] It's obvious that the signal has improved a lot over the last week, but looking back over the last 6 months or so using your graphs, it seems to me that, visually, the 2E signal has become more stable. There are less severe peaks and troughs, and the 2E signal line now looks a lot flatter, and comparable to 2F. Previously there was quite a considerable difference between the graph lines of the two sats, whereas now, although not in sync, they broadly look quite similar. Is it possible that they are bringing the daily wobble gradually under control ? Did 2F show something similar in its early days, and then finally settled down? Of course, this is just a visual impression, it would need access to the raw data of 2E to trace the highs, lows and averages during the whole period of your monitoring to see if there is a gradual improvement. Or is it just a seasonal blip ? [/QUOTE]

Verification