Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="satesco" data-source="post: 1168256" data-attributes="member: 297935">I didn't want to use such a harsh word, greedy, which in fact confirms the decision he made. Worse than that, the new version,3.73, after which he sets up the subscription, does not come with a massive update, including other functionalities that the previous versions, say, T2-MI, or or subtitling, do not have.I don't want to diminish a developer's effort to improve his application no matter how he does it, but we can't ignore the fact that other DVB Dream features are based on [USER=391236]@CrazyCat[/USER]'s library, like blindscan. There are also DVB players based on this library that were offered for free, see SmartDVB, but I wonder, more rhetorically, are these developers paying to [USER=391236]@CrazyCat[/USER] to use his files? I don't think that our good Ukrainian colleague is demanding, even for a modest amount, that these developers pay him.What is unacceptable in the case of this developer, is that he does not allow old payers to use his application at the version they have been using for years, but has to start from scratch. It is an affront, an offense, if you will, to them that he doesn't care about them. Unless he wants to lose them too. Their reaction to @rel's decision expresses the idea of giving up DVBDream. Is that what he wants?He draws the conclusion if he reads the posts here and on other forums. As they say, every bird dies on its own tongue.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="satesco, post: 1168256, member: 297935"] I didn't want to use such a harsh word, greedy, which in fact confirms the decision he made. Worse than that, the new version,3.73, after which he sets up the subscription, does not come with a massive update, including other functionalities that the previous versions, say, T2-MI, or or subtitling, do not have. I don't want to diminish a developer's effort to improve his application no matter how he does it, but we can't ignore the fact that other DVB Dream features are based on [USER=391236]@CrazyCat[/USER]'s library, like blindscan. There are also DVB players based on this library that were offered for free, see SmartDVB, but I wonder, more rhetorically, are these developers paying to [USER=391236]@CrazyCat[/USER] to use his files? I don't think that our good Ukrainian colleague is demanding, even for a modest amount, that these developers pay him. What is unacceptable in the case of this developer, is that he does not allow old payers to use his application at the version they have been using for years, but has to start from scratch. It is an affront, an offense, if you will, to them that he doesn't care about them. Unless he wants to lose them too. Their reaction to @rel's decision expresses the idea of giving up DVBDream. Is that what he wants? He draws the conclusion if he reads the posts here and on other forums. As they say, every bird dies on its own tongue. [/QUOTE]

Verification