Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
DISH SETUP: Single sat, Multi-Sat & Motorised
Satellite Footprint Library
Satellite Footprint Discussion
Eutelsat W3C at 16.0°E ???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="A nonymous" data-source="post: 786420" data-attributes="member: 240839"><p>Its common sence Shavit, if the satellite wasn't where it was supposed to be nobody with a static dish pointing at 16e would get anything. </p><p></p><p>I mean come on 3 million Albanians can't be wrong can they <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite57" alt=":-lmao" title="LMAO :-lmao" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":-lmao" /></p><p></p><p>Unless you have secretly gone round europe and adjusted every dish to 14.5 degrees there would be an uproar as 3 million Albanians couldn't watch their TV, and i wouldn't have been watching Digitalb this morning.</p><p></p><p>The Americans as everybody knows aren't infallible and they do get things wrong more often than they would like to admit to. Just because their pulished data is incorrect you can guarentee that the data they use for thereselves isn't.</p><p></p><p>If W3C was not at 16e we would be getting jot, but as my setup clearly showed me this morning its still at 16e. I use a 1m dish for 16e. one and a half degrees would be out of the angle of acceptance for that dish, if the satellite was at 14.5 degrees i would be getting nothing. How does your data explain that <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite53" alt=":confused" title="Confused :confused" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":confused" /></p><p></p><p>Nano</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="A nonymous, post: 786420, member: 240839"] Its common sence Shavit, if the satellite wasn't where it was supposed to be nobody with a static dish pointing at 16e would get anything. I mean come on 3 million Albanians can't be wrong can they :-lmao Unless you have secretly gone round europe and adjusted every dish to 14.5 degrees there would be an uproar as 3 million Albanians couldn't watch their TV, and i wouldn't have been watching Digitalb this morning. The Americans as everybody knows aren't infallible and they do get things wrong more often than they would like to admit to. Just because their pulished data is incorrect you can guarentee that the data they use for thereselves isn't. If W3C was not at 16e we would be getting jot, but as my setup clearly showed me this morning its still at 16e. I use a 1m dish for 16e. one and a half degrees would be out of the angle of acceptance for that dish, if the satellite was at 14.5 degrees i would be getting nothing. How does your data explain that :confused: Nano [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
DISH SETUP: Single sat, Multi-Sat & Motorised
Satellite Footprint Library
Satellite Footprint Discussion
Eutelsat W3C at 16.0°E ???
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top