timo_w2s
Retired moderator
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2005
- Messages
- 4,368
- Reaction score
- 2,889
- Points
- 113
- My Satellite Setup
-
Vu+ Duo 4K SE
Dr.HD F15
- My Location
- Maidenhead, UK & Helsinki, Finland
I thought I'd posted this already but I guess I forgot...
A few weeks ago I compared the tuners of the F15 to the Sky DRX595 (the small non-PVR Sky HD box, which I believe is similar to a DRX890 reception wise, and slightly better than the Pace 2600C1) and an old Technomate 6900 non-Super using a few weak southern beam signals from 28.2E on an 80cm dish in Helsinki.
The conclusion was the F15 easily beat the TM6900. A few channels that the TM6900 couldn't lock at all were showing with just a bit of breakup on the F15.
The DRX595 was very similar to the F15. Video wise not sure if I could say which was better (the DRX595 had a few random blocks, the F15 missed whole frames occasionally but no real blockiness), but perhaps the DRX595 held on to the sound a tiny bit better. Not really much in it. However, as reported in other threads, I found that when my Inverto Black Ultra was connected via a short (3m) cable directly to the F15 it was overpowering the tuner. By looping the signal through a DiSEqC switch and the TM6900 before feeding it into the F15 it give me much higher signal qualities (giving the similar results to the DRX595).
I also was able to lock on to a number of other transponders on other satellites with significant improvements over the TM6900. For example the Swiss HD transponder on 10971/H on Hotbird won't hold a lock long enough to decode anything on the TM6900 but the F15 was working with no problems. A number of transponders from 9E where also visible for the first time using the F15.
Attached are a couple of photos of side by side comparisons from 28.2E.
I got to say I'm impressed.
A few weeks ago I compared the tuners of the F15 to the Sky DRX595 (the small non-PVR Sky HD box, which I believe is similar to a DRX890 reception wise, and slightly better than the Pace 2600C1) and an old Technomate 6900 non-Super using a few weak southern beam signals from 28.2E on an 80cm dish in Helsinki.
The conclusion was the F15 easily beat the TM6900. A few channels that the TM6900 couldn't lock at all were showing with just a bit of breakup on the F15.
The DRX595 was very similar to the F15. Video wise not sure if I could say which was better (the DRX595 had a few random blocks, the F15 missed whole frames occasionally but no real blockiness), but perhaps the DRX595 held on to the sound a tiny bit better. Not really much in it. However, as reported in other threads, I found that when my Inverto Black Ultra was connected via a short (3m) cable directly to the F15 it was overpowering the tuner. By looping the signal through a DiSEqC switch and the TM6900 before feeding it into the F15 it give me much higher signal qualities (giving the similar results to the DRX595).
I also was able to lock on to a number of other transponders on other satellites with significant improvements over the TM6900. For example the Swiss HD transponder on 10971/H on Hotbird won't hold a lock long enough to decode anything on the TM6900 but the F15 was working with no problems. A number of transponders from 9E where also visible for the first time using the F15.
Attached are a couple of photos of side by side comparisons from 28.2E.
I got to say I'm impressed.