Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="aceb" data-source="post: 742281" data-attributes="member: 268811"><p>I agree that blind scanning is desirable but sometimes it's not practical, or at least it's not as far as I can see. Blind scanning 9E or the birds either side produce so many hits by the time you'd checked through them all the feed would more than likely have disappeared. Obviously on some of the more obscure satellites it's not a problem but it would be nice to have software that could compare the results with a transponder table to see what is temporary. The Prof 7301 I'm using is excellent for sensitivity and functionality but I still use the Skystar2 as it can blind scan, just a shame it can't BS S2.</p></blockquote><p></p>