Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jeallen01" data-source="post: 1005883" data-attributes="member: 176704">&quot;For Terryl&quot;!A quick scan from an old copy of the Handbook to the US National Electrical Code, Article 210, on &quot;Attachment Plugs and Receptacles&quot; (plugs and sockets to the rest of us&quot;) to illustrate the &quot;variety&quot; of US plug configurations - the first page is for normal &quot;push-in&quot; plugs, and the second (sorry it's upside down!) is for the &quot;push in and twist&quot; locking varieties for more secure connections.Just a few then! - standardise that lot down to just ONE single design (in your dreams!)PS: if anyone wants a higher definition version then I can do that - but these pages are good enough for most people to get the general idea <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jeallen01, post: 1005883, member: 176704"] "For Terryl"! A quick scan from an old copy of the Handbook to the US National Electrical Code, Article 210, on "Attachment Plugs and Receptacles" (plugs and sockets to the rest of us") to illustrate the "variety" of US plug configurations - the first page is for normal "push-in" plugs, and the second (sorry it's upside down!) is for the "push in and twist" locking varieties for more secure connections. Just a few then! - standardise that lot down to just ONE single design (in your dreams!) PS: if anyone wants a higher definition version then I can do that - but these pages are good enough for most people to get the general idea :D. [/QUOTE]

Verification