Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="lovelyperson" data-source="post: 1127114" data-attributes="member: 183338">Earlier, tried GTMedia GTCombo v GTMedia V8 UHD sensitivity comparison and again it appears that re: sensitivity/reception the V8 UHD gains:-Es'hail-2 - 25.8° E&nbsp;&nbsp; x-band10492 H 1500&nbsp; ID:- 'A71A'&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Es’hailsat promo'Good reception with the V8 UHD 69% 'Quality' reading.................GTCombo just 5% 'Quality' reading,&nbsp; both with 1.8m dish Alicante, España.¿Is there a hardware/firmware difference reason the Combo fails with this particular frequency or........?Like others here, still feel the two receivers are great value and just personally wish the V8 UHD had the more modern and colorful interfaces of the Combo............guess the V8 UHD shows its ageWith luck and thanks to your input to GTMedia the next firmware release for the Combo will improve things.All be safe.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="lovelyperson, post: 1127114, member: 183338"] Earlier, tried GTMedia GTCombo v GTMedia V8 UHD sensitivity comparison and again it appears that re: sensitivity/reception the V8 UHD gains:- Es'hail-2 - 25.8° E x-band 10492 H 1500 ID:- 'A71A' Es’hailsat promo' Good reception with the V8 UHD 69% 'Quality' reading.................GTCombo just 5% 'Quality' reading, both with 1.8m dish Alicante, España. ¿Is there a hardware/firmware difference reason the Combo fails with this particular frequency or........? Like others here, still feel the two receivers are great value and just personally wish the V8 UHD had the more modern and colorful interfaces of the Combo............guess the V8 UHD shows its age With luck and thanks to your input to GTMedia the next firmware release for the Combo will improve things. All be safe. [/QUOTE]

Verification