Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="moonbase" data-source="post: 1125218" data-attributes="member: 178786">Not much new to report today from the Middle East beam of 39.0E, it is the same batch of frequencies in use for feeds.The list of locked frequencies remains unchanged from that in my reply above.I have attached a few pictures below of todays scan including a picture from the Kuw002 three channel mux which is a basketball feed from Kuwait.Also included in the pictures is a scan taken using Crazy Scan with a TBS6903 card. I have superimposed on the Crazy Scan picture the signal level readings taken from the Octagon SF8008 receiver for those signals it locked.The SF8008 readings hold up against the TBS6903 card which might be surprising, perhaps not? To me, it suggests the SiLabs tuner and the drivers in the SF8008 are pretty decent..[ATTACH]140704[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]140705[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]140706[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]140707[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]140708[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]140709[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="moonbase, post: 1125218, member: 178786"] Not much new to report today from the Middle East beam of 39.0E, it is the same batch of frequencies in use for feeds. The list of locked frequencies remains unchanged from that in my reply above. I have attached a few pictures below of todays scan including a picture from the Kuw002 three channel mux which is a basketball feed from Kuwait. Also included in the pictures is a scan taken using Crazy Scan with a TBS6903 card. I have superimposed on the Crazy Scan picture the signal level readings taken from the Octagon SF8008 receiver for those signals it locked. The SF8008 readings hold up against the TBS6903 card which might be surprising, perhaps not? To me, it suggests the SiLabs tuner and the drivers in the SF8008 are pretty decent. . [ATTACH]140704[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]140705[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]140706[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]140707[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]140708[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]140709[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification