Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="madharry" data-source="post: 3024" data-attributes="member: 175291">Hmmm...Seems to be a bit my way of thinkingAbout canal+&gt;Will as seems likely that Canal+ will be his next victim? &lt;I have heard on the grape vine that after all this hacking going on&nbsp; there&nbsp; planingA&nbsp; new type of =&nbsp;&nbsp; phone order authentication, &amp; direct download of Sat to receiver Encrypted programs .and as for....&gt;Can't do that Jon, don't you think they'd have tried it before? They have squeezed all of the analogue channels in that the network will take. &lt;I believe that the opposite was quoted in a TV traders magazine in around since the late 70s.( sound sub-carrier-wave interference is the hard part )but then it's strange how the Multiplex at a fare lower broadcast watt's out put power&nbsp; has managed to squeeze it's self in there between the high power analog transmitters.but yes ...re,tuning of all the analog channels would cause some bad news for fellow TV engineers....digitl is here...just imagine&nbsp; the old scrap analog TV mountain when analog transmitters go offRespect ...Jon</blockquote>

[QUOTE="madharry, post: 3024, member: 175291"] Hmmm...Seems to be a bit my way of thinking About canal+ >Will as seems likely that Canal+ will be his next victim? Can't do that Jon, don't you think they'd have tried it before? They have squeezed all of the analogue channels in that the network will take. < I believe that the opposite was quoted in a TV traders magazine in around since the late 70s. ( sound sub-carrier-wave interference is the hard part ) but then it's strange how the Multiplex at a fare lower broadcast watt's out put power has managed to squeeze it's self in there between the high power analog transmitters. but yes ...re,tuning of all the analog channels would cause some bad news for fellow TV engineers. ...digitl is here...just imagine the old scrap analog TV mountain when analog transmitters go off Respect ...Jon [/QUOTE]

Verification