Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="satesco" data-source="post: 1086310" data-attributes="member: 297935">As far as I'm concerned, I'd like to be 901's footprint posted by you,but if it were as you say,that map raises a question that jumps in the eyes of the person looking at it,namely:what happens to the reception of the BBC package if the signal for England is around 46.6dBW,as the footprint above shows?As you can see,the center of the spot is on southern Europe and not on its northwest,as it was on Intelsat 907.The reports of those who have posted so far and are in this part of the continent tell us that the signal has increased a little and seems to say something other than the map of 901 posted.For me it is enough to find that in my area this signal is low,which is proof that the footprint of 901 will be like at 907,perhaps with a slight difference on its edge.That's why I'm waiting for the operator to publish 901's footprint now that he's moved it to 27.5W.Regards</blockquote>

[QUOTE="satesco, post: 1086310, member: 297935"] As far as I'm concerned, I'd like to be 901's footprint posted by you,but if it were as you say,that map raises a question that jumps in the eyes of the person looking at it,namely:what happens to the reception of the BBC package if the signal for England is around 46.6dBW,as the footprint above shows?As you can see,the center of the spot is on southern Europe and not on its northwest,as it was on Intelsat 907. The reports of those who have posted so far and are in this part of the continent tell us that the signal has increased a little and seems to say something other than the map of 901 posted. For me it is enough to find that in my area this signal is low,which is proof that the footprint of 901 will be like at 907,perhaps with a slight difference on its edge.That's why I'm waiting for the operator to publish 901's footprint now that he's moved it to 27.5W. Regards [/QUOTE]

Verification