Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="satesco" data-source="post: 1149189" data-attributes="member: 297935">HI, FC GD,I noticed this last month when I tried to see the signal on some muxes. The weakest was 11495 V, around 6.0dB, in the afternoon. But I waited until the evening, when in my area, it increased, and I saw a slight improvement, about 1 dB, but not stable.I monitored the satellite for a few days, and only those at the bottom of the band had an improved signal; then, gradually, it was a little better at 11495 V.Unfortunately, on 11609V, which had the strongest signal at 27.1W before, with ip-over-sat, the signal weakened a lot. At one point, I managed to get a good signal on all muxes.At one point, I also managed to make a Radio recording at 11689 V,166, having this time, as never before, a stable signal around 7.5dB, obtained with an Inverto PLL lnb.However, the weakest signal remains 11495 V.I remind you that I use a 1.50m antenna and IBU lnb:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="satesco, post: 1149189, member: 297935"] HI, FC GD, I noticed this last month when I tried to see the signal on some muxes. The weakest was 11495 V, around 6.0dB, in the afternoon. But I waited until the evening, when in my area, it increased, and I saw a slight improvement, about 1 dB, but not stable. I monitored the satellite for a few days, and only those at the bottom of the band had an improved signal; then, gradually, it was a little better at 11495 V. Unfortunately, on 11609V, which had the strongest signal at 27.1W before, with ip-over-sat, the signal weakened a lot. At one point, I managed to get a good signal on all muxes. At one point, I also managed to make a Radio recording at 11689 V,166, having this time, as never before, a stable signal around 7.5dB, obtained with an Inverto PLL lnb. However, the weakest signal remains 11495 V. I remind you that I use a 1.50m antenna and IBU lnb: [/QUOTE]

Verification