Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Topper" data-source="post: 632604" data-attributes="member: 186250"><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite82" alt=":-hijack" title="Hijack&nbsp; &nbsp; :-hijack" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":-hijack" />God forbid Europe should adopt something British It's a long line indeed, Did you know you were late for work? <img src="https://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" data-shortname=":)" />If time zones based upon longitude are good enough for the rest of the world why does Europe insist upon not using them. Is there some hidden benefit that we are not aware of? Or perhaps it is the case that the UK has refused to budge on the issue:-topicDoes seem strange as it is indicative of time sharing but the hours seem odd I cannot think of any another channels that broadcast between 07.00 am and 10.30 am only</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Topper, post: 632604, member: 186250"] :-hijack God forbid Europe should adopt something British It's a long line indeed, Did you know you were late for work? :) If time zones based upon longitude are good enough for the rest of the world why does Europe insist upon not using them. Is there some hidden benefit that we are not aware of? Or perhaps it is the case that the UK has refused to budge on the issue :-topic Does seem strange as it is indicative of time sharing but the hours seem odd I cannot think of any another channels that broadcast between 07.00 am and 10.30 am only [/QUOTE]

Verification