Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Topics
Members Lounge
The Football and Sport Section
Join our F1 Fantasy League 2009
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MaverickF1" data-source="post: 619390" data-attributes="member: 326753"><p>I agree, it isn't a satisfying Pure Fantasy F1 season so far, because of the new balance of power in the real Formula 1.</p><p></p><p>I wasn't really prepared for this situation. I tried to save the season with the extraordinary adjustment of the Brawn GP component costs after race 7. Unfortunately the action haven't worked very well, because many team owners were able to switch from Brawn GP to Red Bull components. </p><p></p><p>The reasons why the reprising action almost failed are:</p><p></p><p>- It was too late in the season</p><p>- The team budgets were already too high</p><p>- I adjusted only the prices of the Brawn GP components (and not the prices of all other components too)</p><p></p><p>The positive aspect is, that I have gained experience for the next year and I have available a new powerful feature to correct component prices during the season.</p><p></p><p>What should I do, to prevent such a situation in the next season?</p><p></p><p>The suggestion to bring in a '3 components rule' is a good one, at first sight. </p><p>But would it solve the problem? I am afraid not.</p><p>Please take a look at this season. If we apply this rule (without a reprising of component costs of course), what would be the difference? Instead of all Brawn GP or all Red Bull teams, we would have mixed teams with Brawn GP and Red Bull components. </p><p>But the main problem wouldn't be solved: no real team budget limitations and too fast rising team budgets.</p><p>That's why I think that a '3 components rule' won't be the answer.</p><p></p><p>Currently I intend to go in this direction:</p><p></p><p><strong>An obligatory extraordinary adjustment of ALL component costs after race 3. </strong></p><p></p><p>The team budgets don't vary that much in the first 3 races and the general performance of the Formula 1 teams is foreseeable. After that reprising action the restricted team budgets won't allow the selection of all components from a F1 top team. </p><p></p><p>At the moment I think, as long as the component prices are in a realistic range, a '3 components rule' won't be necessary.</p><p></p><p>What do you believe? I am looking forward to read your feedback.</p><p></p><p>Kind regards</p><p>Maverick</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MaverickF1, post: 619390, member: 326753"] I agree, it isn't a satisfying Pure Fantasy F1 season so far, because of the new balance of power in the real Formula 1. I wasn't really prepared for this situation. I tried to save the season with the extraordinary adjustment of the Brawn GP component costs after race 7. Unfortunately the action haven't worked very well, because many team owners were able to switch from Brawn GP to Red Bull components. The reasons why the reprising action almost failed are: - It was too late in the season - The team budgets were already too high - I adjusted only the prices of the Brawn GP components (and not the prices of all other components too) The positive aspect is, that I have gained experience for the next year and I have available a new powerful feature to correct component prices during the season. What should I do, to prevent such a situation in the next season? The suggestion to bring in a '3 components rule' is a good one, at first sight. But would it solve the problem? I am afraid not. Please take a look at this season. If we apply this rule (without a reprising of component costs of course), what would be the difference? Instead of all Brawn GP or all Red Bull teams, we would have mixed teams with Brawn GP and Red Bull components. But the main problem wouldn't be solved: no real team budget limitations and too fast rising team budgets. That's why I think that a '3 components rule' won't be the answer. Currently I intend to go in this direction: [B]An obligatory extraordinary adjustment of ALL component costs after race 3. [/B] The team budgets don't vary that much in the first 3 races and the general performance of the Formula 1 teams is foreseeable. After that reprising action the restricted team budgets won't allow the selection of all components from a F1 top team. At the moment I think, as long as the component prices are in a realistic range, a '3 components rule' won't be necessary. What do you believe? I am looking forward to read your feedback. Kind regards Maverick [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Topics
Members Lounge
The Football and Sport Section
Join our F1 Fantasy League 2009
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
