Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
DISH SETUP: Single sat, Multi-Sat & Motorised
Large dish gain figures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Waveguide" data-source="post: 880926" data-attributes="member: 364636"><p>Got too much coffein today and reading antenna books is a tried and</p><p>trusted tranquilizer. The medication was [Per-Simon Kildal - Foundations</p><p>Of Antennas p. 331] and [C.A. Balanis - Antenna Theory p. 821].</p><p>Whatever you do - No overdoses of those please! It's heavy stuff!</p><p> </p><p>Both books gives figures for surface accuracy and both end up with</p><p>a maximal deviation from the optimal shape less than approx. 2 mm to</p><p>have small (< 0,3 d<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /> impact on directivity. Their "directivity" is</p><p>your "antenna gain". Rough surfaces makes the central lobe smaller and</p><p>wider. Small f/d ratio makes it more sensitive to imperfections.</p><p>(diameter 5000 mm and wavelength 30 mm as input to the calculations)</p><p>A diagram in [Balanis] gives the same values for directivity as mentioned</p><p>earlier, 54 to 55 dB. Surface errors will reduce it from this maximal value.</p><p> </p><p>Manufacturing method, assembly/installation of antenna parts will</p><p>determine if the dish lives up to whats in the specification.</p><p> </p><p>The "finetuning" of the dish in Channel Hopper's image must be something</p><p>invented after my books were written.</p><p> </p><p>... now I feel another double espresso would be nice.</p><p> </p><p>(if there are smilies instead of "dB", blame the forum software)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Waveguide, post: 880926, member: 364636"] Got too much coffein today and reading antenna books is a tried and trusted tranquilizer. The medication was [Per-Simon Kildal - Foundations Of Antennas p. 331] and [C.A. Balanis - Antenna Theory p. 821]. Whatever you do - No overdoses of those please! It's heavy stuff! Both books gives figures for surface accuracy and both end up with a maximal deviation from the optimal shape less than approx. 2 mm to have small (< 0,3 d:cool: impact on directivity. Their "directivity" is your "antenna gain". Rough surfaces makes the central lobe smaller and wider. Small f/d ratio makes it more sensitive to imperfections. (diameter 5000 mm and wavelength 30 mm as input to the calculations) A diagram in [Balanis] gives the same values for directivity as mentioned earlier, 54 to 55 dB. Surface errors will reduce it from this maximal value. Manufacturing method, assembly/installation of antenna parts will determine if the dish lives up to whats in the specification. The "finetuning" of the dish in Channel Hopper's image must be something invented after my books were written. ... now I feel another double espresso would be nice. (if there are smilies instead of "dB", blame the forum software) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
DISH SETUP: Single sat, Multi-Sat & Motorised
Large dish gain figures
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top