Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="a33" data-source="post: 1072904" data-attributes="member: 332642">A four satellite system would not be unusual in Belgium/Flanders: 13E, 19E, 23E and 28E; even 5W could be there.So I would indeed (as @CH proposes) check what programs you get when you scan with diseqc 1.0 (or diseqc 2.0) setting A, B, C and D.You'd have to try each setting, and do a blind scan each time.That way you can define 4 satellites, and have a program list for each of them. BTW the name of the satellite in your receiver is not important at all, when you receive 28E programs from a satellite called &quot;Astra1/19E&quot; or &quot;Theresa May&quot; or &quot;Phil Collins&quot;, it will still be 28E.Scanning the four diseqc settings will enlighten, if you in fact have 4 satellites at your disposal (under diseqc 1.0 protokol).BTW2 Diseqc 1.1 (or 2.1) would, though possible,&nbsp; be unusual for a 4 satellite setup.Greetz,A33</blockquote>

[QUOTE="a33, post: 1072904, member: 332642"] A four satellite system would not be unusual in Belgium/Flanders: 13E, 19E, 23E and 28E; even 5W could be there. So I would indeed (as @CH proposes) check what programs you get when you scan with diseqc 1.0 (or diseqc 2.0) setting A, B, C and D. You'd have to try each setting, and do a blind scan each time. That way you can define 4 satellites, and have a program list for each of them. BTW the name of the satellite in your receiver is not important at all, when you receive 28E programs from a satellite called "Astra1/19E" or "Theresa May" or "Phil Collins", it will still be 28E. Scanning the four diseqc settings will enlighten, if you in fact have 4 satellites at your disposal (under diseqc 1.0 protokol). BTW2 Diseqc 1.1 (or 2.1) would, though possible, be unusual for a 4 satellite setup. Greetz, A33 [/QUOTE]

Verification