Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Miscellaneous Sections
Tech Head - The Technology Section
Einstein's Alcove
mesh vs solid dishes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Simba27" data-source="post: 60951" data-attributes="member: 182734"><p>As a newb here, I don't wish to dispute your expert opinion Rolfw. But I have some vague memories of A-level physics which I'd like to enter into the discussion.<img src="https://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>When a wave meets a hole smaller than the wavelength, doesn't it get "diffracted", ie. spread out? And with multiple holes, IIRC, this leads to interference patterns.</p><p></p><p>Surely for the purposes of satellite reception it's better to reflect the wave in the direction of the LNB than to diffract it?</p><p></p><p>I can see that the precise shape of the dish is very important to direct the signal into the LNB. My rough estimate suggests that, on this size of dish, the surface must be within 2 degrees of the correct angle. I think that's achieveable by simply sanding the filler flush to the metal surrounding it.</p><p></p><p>I'm actually going to try this in a very scientific way and measure the gain or loss (if any). It won't be for a good few weeks though because I have a long list of more important things to do. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>BTW. Am I posting this nonsense in the right area? I've noticed that most of the posts in the alcove are non-satellite related.</p><p></p><p>Phil.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Simba27, post: 60951, member: 182734"] As a newb here, I don't wish to dispute your expert opinion Rolfw. But I have some vague memories of A-level physics which I'd like to enter into the discussion.:) When a wave meets a hole smaller than the wavelength, doesn't it get "diffracted", ie. spread out? And with multiple holes, IIRC, this leads to interference patterns. Surely for the purposes of satellite reception it's better to reflect the wave in the direction of the LNB than to diffract it? I can see that the precise shape of the dish is very important to direct the signal into the LNB. My rough estimate suggests that, on this size of dish, the surface must be within 2 degrees of the correct angle. I think that's achieveable by simply sanding the filler flush to the metal surrounding it. I'm actually going to try this in a very scientific way and measure the gain or loss (if any). It won't be for a good few weeks though because I have a long list of more important things to do. :D BTW. Am I posting this nonsense in the right area? I've noticed that most of the posts in the alcove are non-satellite related. Phil. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Miscellaneous Sections
Tech Head - The Technology Section
Einstein's Alcove
mesh vs solid dishes
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top