Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="A nonymous" data-source="post: 677149" data-attributes="member: 240839">I'm not impressed with Triax stuff, Its too noisy and useless on big systems like high rises without a lot of messing about with slope compensators and attenuators <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite21" alt=":-ohcrap" title="Oh Crap&nbsp; &nbsp; :-ohcrap" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":-ohcrap" />After the hassle i've had with the high rises on our current contract, which incidentally are all Triax based systems thers no way in a million years i would ever recommend their TMM 5 Series stuff.&nbsp; Its horrible stuff to work with O-noI've worked on and installed large systems (+100 points)&nbsp; using either Spaun, Fracarro, Johannsson or Vision equipment and its all been straight forward with no issues.&nbsp; I've only ever had hassle with Triax equipment.Don't get me wrong i can get it to work, but only with a hell of a lot of messing about <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite14" alt=":-doh" title="DOH!&nbsp; &nbsp; :-doh" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":-doh" />2I hate Triax equipment and I would never recommend it to anybody, but thats just my opinion.&nbsp; I've had nothing but bad experiences with Triax stuff which is why i don't like it.As for smaller systems, i can't comment as i normally just use Fracarro or Vision on the smaller setups <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />I'm sure there are other people that like Triax stuff and their opnions are just as valid as mine.&nbsp; Each engineer has his preference to what sort of equipment they use.My opinion is just biased towards Fracarro &amp; Vision due to the very little amount of problems they have ever caused me <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />:-beerNano</blockquote>

[QUOTE="A nonymous, post: 677149, member: 240839"] I'm not impressed with Triax stuff, Its too noisy and useless on big systems like high rises without a lot of messing about with slope compensators and attenuators :-ohcrap After the hassle i've had with the high rises on our current contract, which incidentally are all Triax based systems thers no way in a million years i would ever recommend their TMM 5 Series stuff. Its horrible stuff to work with O-no I've worked on and installed large systems (+100 points) using either Spaun, Fracarro, Johannsson or Vision equipment and its all been straight forward with no issues. I've only ever had hassle with Triax equipment. Don't get me wrong i can get it to work, but only with a hell of a lot of messing about :-DOH2 I hate Triax equipment and I would never recommend it to anybody, but thats just my opinion. I've had nothing but bad experiences with Triax stuff which is why i don't like it. As for smaller systems, i can't comment as i normally just use Fracarro or Vision on the smaller setups :D I'm sure there are other people that like Triax stuff and their opnions are just as valid as mine. Each engineer has his preference to what sort of equipment they use. My opinion is just biased towards Fracarro & Vision due to the very little amount of problems they have ever caused me :D :-beer Nano [/QUOTE]

Verification