Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vipersan" data-source="post: 669974" data-attributes="member: 325666">Hi friends ...Some preliminary results on this new lnbf..The Pauxis was replaced with the DMS ..No ajustments made or alignment performed ...I just placed the small slab of dielectric material that came with the lnbf ...into the throat.I was amazrd to see a fully locked pictures from ERTU at 1West....and intermittent/fragmented images from the Pentagon channel.I have _never_ had this kind of gain from the pauxis ....Typically I would get quality around 25 with a fully aligned lnbf with an extended T dielectric ...and similar results with a DOS plate.. on Pentagonbut Im getting around 20 quality with a simple 1 inch long slab of dielectric material ...and an unfucused untweaked lnbfI can only conclude this new LNBF has great potential...Hopefully some more coherant results inthe future ....but for now ...its too bloody cold out there..rgdsVS</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vipersan, post: 669974, member: 325666"] Hi friends ... Some preliminary results on this new lnbf.. The Pauxis was replaced with the DMS .. No ajustments made or alignment performed ... I just placed the small slab of dielectric material that came with the lnbf ...into the throat. I was amazrd to see a fully locked pictures from ERTU at 1West....and intermittent/fragmented images from the Pentagon channel. I have _never_ had this kind of gain from the pauxis .... Typically I would get quality around 25 with a fully aligned lnbf with an extended T dielectric ...and similar results with a DOS plate.. on Pentagon but Im getting around 20 quality with a simple 1 inch long slab of dielectric material ...and an unfucused untweaked lnbf I can only conclude this new LNBF has great potential... Hopefully some more coherant results inthe future ....but for now ...its too bloody cold out there.. rgds VS [/QUOTE]

Verification