Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Satellite PC Card Receivers, Internet by Satellite
neumoDVB
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="deeptho" data-source="post: 1129399" data-attributes="member: 215446"><p>Yes, the list is made for Western Europe, to limit the "spam"</p><p></p><p></p><p>I am afraid this is a well-known problem of people not reading the documentation and then making incorrect assumptions.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I cannot receive that satellite so it is difficult to comment. Like I wrote before: it can help to set a low symbol rate even when </p><p>asking a blindscan. It does not have to be the correct one. </p><p></p><p>Also, the peak finding algorithm is different (not: better or worse, but different) than crazycat's and is not optimised for these rare cases. If a peak is not detected, you will have to enter a close enough frequency yourself. The frequency might be slightly different from crazycat, because my code learns about lnb frequency drift and corrects for it. The symbol rate is exactly the same (read the documentation).</p><p></p><p>The actual code for programming the chip is probably very close to that in crazycat's closed source driver. So there should be little difference, except due to luck (some things may work better with crazycat. Other things better with neumodvb).</p><p></p><p>Blindscan is always a compromise between speed and between preferring one type of problem versus another. It also</p><p>differs from card to card and it is possible to keep optimizing it for ever, and people will still find something that does not work. Ad fixing one problem then tends to introduce other problems.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="deeptho, post: 1129399, member: 215446"] Yes, the list is made for Western Europe, to limit the "spam" I am afraid this is a well-known problem of people not reading the documentation and then making incorrect assumptions. I cannot receive that satellite so it is difficult to comment. Like I wrote before: it can help to set a low symbol rate even when asking a blindscan. It does not have to be the correct one. Also, the peak finding algorithm is different (not: better or worse, but different) than crazycat's and is not optimised for these rare cases. If a peak is not detected, you will have to enter a close enough frequency yourself. The frequency might be slightly different from crazycat, because my code learns about lnb frequency drift and corrects for it. The symbol rate is exactly the same (read the documentation). The actual code for programming the chip is probably very close to that in crazycat's closed source driver. So there should be little difference, except due to luck (some things may work better with crazycat. Other things better with neumodvb). Blindscan is always a compromise between speed and between preferring one type of problem versus another. It also differs from card to card and it is possible to keep optimizing it for ever, and people will still find something that does not work. Ad fixing one problem then tends to introduce other problems. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Satellite PC Card Receivers, Internet by Satellite
neumoDVB
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top