Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Satellite PC Card Receivers, Internet by Satellite
neumoDVB
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="satesco" data-source="post: 1132659" data-attributes="member: 297935"><p>I confess that I am glad I am not alone in these tests. The more testers, the better the results.</p><p>I can't figure out why you can't lock 11689 V at 27.5W? Theoretically, you're more likely to get it because you're in the spot, so the signal is stronger.</p><p>I don't know if you've ever tried to catch this transponder with Crazyscan, under Windows, with the 6903 cards. You have a better chance of success than now, the first time on Linux.</p><p>On this Intel 901 there are some low symbol rate transponders besides 11689 V, namely :11591 V,250,8/9,11685 V,166,8/9,etc(see FS).</p><p>These low symbol rates, and others, are a double challenge, one for Deeptho to find a solution to lock them under Linux which is not possible on Windows, and on the other hand, for us, enthusiasts to be able to receive them!</p><p>I have installed the formidable neumoDVB for this reason. I am trying to test these DVB cards with Deeptho's application to know if some of the limits observed on Windows are of the cards or of the application?</p><p> I have to admit it's a strange claim, and probably unrealistic.</p><p>Regards <img src="https://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="satesco, post: 1132659, member: 297935"] I confess that I am glad I am not alone in these tests. The more testers, the better the results. I can't figure out why you can't lock 11689 V at 27.5W? Theoretically, you're more likely to get it because you're in the spot, so the signal is stronger. I don't know if you've ever tried to catch this transponder with Crazyscan, under Windows, with the 6903 cards. You have a better chance of success than now, the first time on Linux. On this Intel 901 there are some low symbol rate transponders besides 11689 V, namely :11591 V,250,8/9,11685 V,166,8/9,etc(see FS). These low symbol rates, and others, are a double challenge, one for Deeptho to find a solution to lock them under Linux which is not possible on Windows, and on the other hand, for us, enthusiasts to be able to receive them! I have installed the formidable neumoDVB for this reason. I am trying to test these DVB cards with Deeptho's application to know if some of the limits observed on Windows are of the cards or of the application? I have to admit it's a strange claim, and probably unrealistic. Regards :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Satellite PC Card Receivers, Internet by Satellite
neumoDVB
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top