Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Satellite PC Card Receivers, Internet by Satellite
neumoDVB
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="satesco" data-source="post: 1144365" data-attributes="member: 297935"><p>Thanks, [USER=175007]@Llew[/USER], for wanting to check the signal on those two nearby satellites. But your area is outside Amos3's footprint, and if you also use a smaller antenna, your result may not be conclusive.</p><p>The first Amos 1 and 2, when they became operational in the 2000s, had such a strong signal that it disturbed reception of some frequencies at 5.0W, and vice versa, from Eutelsat 5 West (before Atlantic Bird 5). With offset antennas, this signal couldn't be fully discriminated. Those with smaller antennas had reception problems anyway because of the strong signal at the two positions. Even with big antennas, as I have, I had to move my antenna from the focus from 4.0W a little further east.</p><p>Here is the explanation although I have a big (symmetrical) antenna for the Amos 3 spot Europa, and so I would have a chance to separate the signal at these close positions, with the 1.50m antenna, I get a pretty good signal at the 5.0W position.</p><p>But that's not my problem with the signal, but how the 6903x/6909x cards are "capable" (quotation marks required) of receiving the same signal on two different frequencies.</p><p>That's the question I'm asking [USER=215446]@Deeptho[/USER], and if [USER=391236]@CrazyCat[/USER] reads this topic, all the better because this phenomenon manifests itself with the stid135 chip on both operating systems. And I think only these two brilliant developers can find an explanation, but more importantly, fix this problem.</p><p>I discovered the same thing a few years ago at 90.0E, when I first used Crazyscan, then adapted for 6903x/6909x cards. In the meantime, after countless Crazyscan updates, I never noticed one of the frequencies repeating. But, as already known, the stid135 chip is still, even for developers, a permanent challenge. Each satellite has its peculiarities through its transponders, so it's no wonder they must update their applications according to the bugs they discover.</p><p>Probably other users could check the situation I described if they meet the same reception conditions, as signal and the same card used. And I would be happy for such verification to confirm or refute the allegations and evidence I have brought forward.</p><p>Regards</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="satesco, post: 1144365, member: 297935"] Thanks, [USER=175007]@Llew[/USER], for wanting to check the signal on those two nearby satellites. But your area is outside Amos3's footprint, and if you also use a smaller antenna, your result may not be conclusive. The first Amos 1 and 2, when they became operational in the 2000s, had such a strong signal that it disturbed reception of some frequencies at 5.0W, and vice versa, from Eutelsat 5 West (before Atlantic Bird 5). With offset antennas, this signal couldn't be fully discriminated. Those with smaller antennas had reception problems anyway because of the strong signal at the two positions. Even with big antennas, as I have, I had to move my antenna from the focus from 4.0W a little further east. Here is the explanation although I have a big (symmetrical) antenna for the Amos 3 spot Europa, and so I would have a chance to separate the signal at these close positions, with the 1.50m antenna, I get a pretty good signal at the 5.0W position. But that's not my problem with the signal, but how the 6903x/6909x cards are "capable" (quotation marks required) of receiving the same signal on two different frequencies. That's the question I'm asking [USER=215446]@Deeptho[/USER], and if [USER=391236]@CrazyCat[/USER] reads this topic, all the better because this phenomenon manifests itself with the stid135 chip on both operating systems. And I think only these two brilliant developers can find an explanation, but more importantly, fix this problem. I discovered the same thing a few years ago at 90.0E, when I first used Crazyscan, then adapted for 6903x/6909x cards. In the meantime, after countless Crazyscan updates, I never noticed one of the frequencies repeating. But, as already known, the stid135 chip is still, even for developers, a permanent challenge. Each satellite has its peculiarities through its transponders, so it's no wonder they must update their applications according to the bugs they discover. Probably other users could check the situation I described if they meet the same reception conditions, as signal and the same card used. And I would be happy for such verification to confirm or refute the allegations and evidence I have brought forward. Regards [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Satellite PC Card Receivers, Internet by Satellite
neumoDVB
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top