Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Satellite PC Card Receivers, Internet by Satellite
neumoDVB
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="satesco" data-source="post: 1144408" data-attributes="member: 297935"><p>Deeptho,</p><p></p><p>I take your proposal(ad-hoc) to change antennas cum grano salis because tests done with a 1.10m antenna, smaller than the one used in previous tests, 1. 50m, gave me the same result. Moreover, with a Tratec (Holland) 20dB variable attenuator, the signal not only decreased but, on the contrary, increased with both antennas, discovering another mux in the lower band, 11140 H, 30000, 3/4, which in the upper band is at 12689 H, being in the vicinity of 12725 H, which I mentioned on the topic.</p><p>If I go by the explanation given with the lnb's, then I have to blame this lnb for the similar result to 12725 H.So two lnbs with two different antennas and two stid cards provide the same effect in both operating systems. </p><p>I'm sorry, but the fact that I have to reduce the signal with an attenuator or wet close is not conclusive. Rather it indicates a symptom. I didn't use the wet close, but the attenuator only boosted my signal rather than reduced it, even on a 1.10 m dish. (See pictures). And even if it confirms your assumption, I don't see what it proves. As they say, a nail can be removed with another nail, but the hole remains.</p><p>Your answer leaves me with the impression that beyond the arithmetic calculations made (and these are useful), there is no solution to the problem I raised. We must go into the face's inner "chip" to find a solution. As long as we don't see a solution to a particular situation, I find it hard to accept that it is just "my problem." Yes, you're right; it's just my problem; the message delivered belongs to the sender, not the receiver.</p><p>Here's how the attenuator signal test looks with the 6903x/6909x cards with 1.50m and 1.10m antennas:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="satesco, post: 1144408, member: 297935"] Deeptho, I take your proposal(ad-hoc) to change antennas cum grano salis because tests done with a 1.10m antenna, smaller than the one used in previous tests, 1. 50m, gave me the same result. Moreover, with a Tratec (Holland) 20dB variable attenuator, the signal not only decreased but, on the contrary, increased with both antennas, discovering another mux in the lower band, 11140 H, 30000, 3/4, which in the upper band is at 12689 H, being in the vicinity of 12725 H, which I mentioned on the topic. If I go by the explanation given with the lnb's, then I have to blame this lnb for the similar result to 12725 H.So two lnbs with two different antennas and two stid cards provide the same effect in both operating systems. I'm sorry, but the fact that I have to reduce the signal with an attenuator or wet close is not conclusive. Rather it indicates a symptom. I didn't use the wet close, but the attenuator only boosted my signal rather than reduced it, even on a 1.10 m dish. (See pictures). And even if it confirms your assumption, I don't see what it proves. As they say, a nail can be removed with another nail, but the hole remains. Your answer leaves me with the impression that beyond the arithmetic calculations made (and these are useful), there is no solution to the problem I raised. We must go into the face's inner "chip" to find a solution. As long as we don't see a solution to a particular situation, I find it hard to accept that it is just "my problem." Yes, you're right; it's just my problem; the message delivered belongs to the sender, not the receiver. Here's how the attenuator signal test looks with the 6903x/6909x cards with 1.50m and 1.10m antennas: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Satellite PC Card Receivers, Internet by Satellite
neumoDVB
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top