Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Satellite PC Card Receivers, Internet by Satellite
neumoDVB
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="satesco" data-source="post: 1155758" data-attributes="member: 297935"><p>I'm returning to the low symbol rate below 500 Ks/s with the 6903x card after scanning Intelsat 901 at 27.5W.</p><p>Your application seems to disprove (and does well) your opinion about this low symbol rate with the Stid135 cards.</p><p></p><p>Here, blinscan all are found and locked with a 6903x low symbol rate below 500 Ks/s, a radio stream frequency. Both (11590 V,250,8/9 & 11597 V,500,8/9) muxes are Radio transmissions. And it is all the more remarkable as the signal on Intelsat 901 is well outside my reception area.</p><p></p><p>Only with tbs6983 I manage this with Crazyscan under Windows.</p><p>So it can (more?)with stid135 cards!</p><p></p><p>I added a neumoDVB scan of Intelsat 901 with the tbs6983 card. Compared to 6903x, the spectrum on 6983 looks like a disaster.</p><p>I hope to be excused for making such an observation. It verifies what you said earlier that you don't have the cards with demod STV091X based.</p><p></p><p>Maybe it's not worth investing time for such cards. But looking in perspective, what you are doing for Stid135 cards under Linux and [USER=391236]@CrazyCat[/USER] with TBS cards under Windows, I think, opens the door for receiver manufacturers.</p><p></p><p>Let's remember that the first receivers for MIS and PLL for us, simple receivers amateurs, were with dvb cards, and only afterward did these manufacturers release receivers with such specs/possibilities when they realized there was a good market for them. But that's another discussion.</p><p></p><p>In conclusion, you and [USER=391236]@CrazyCat[/USER] are both trailblazers in this field, even if both didn't consider it when creating applications.</p><p>Or if you don't consider yourselves as such, then I would say that you are a kind of interface between them and us, those who benefit from your creations, and even more, we benefit from your generosity as your applications are accessible to all, i.e. free, for which you have our thanks and gratitude.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="satesco, post: 1155758, member: 297935"] I'm returning to the low symbol rate below 500 Ks/s with the 6903x card after scanning Intelsat 901 at 27.5W. Your application seems to disprove (and does well) your opinion about this low symbol rate with the Stid135 cards. Here, blinscan all are found and locked with a 6903x low symbol rate below 500 Ks/s, a radio stream frequency. Both (11590 V,250,8/9 & 11597 V,500,8/9) muxes are Radio transmissions. And it is all the more remarkable as the signal on Intelsat 901 is well outside my reception area. Only with tbs6983 I manage this with Crazyscan under Windows. So it can (more?)with stid135 cards! I added a neumoDVB scan of Intelsat 901 with the tbs6983 card. Compared to 6903x, the spectrum on 6983 looks like a disaster. I hope to be excused for making such an observation. It verifies what you said earlier that you don't have the cards with demod STV091X based. Maybe it's not worth investing time for such cards. But looking in perspective, what you are doing for Stid135 cards under Linux and [USER=391236]@CrazyCat[/USER] with TBS cards under Windows, I think, opens the door for receiver manufacturers. Let's remember that the first receivers for MIS and PLL for us, simple receivers amateurs, were with dvb cards, and only afterward did these manufacturers release receivers with such specs/possibilities when they realized there was a good market for them. But that's another discussion. In conclusion, you and [USER=391236]@CrazyCat[/USER] are both trailblazers in this field, even if both didn't consider it when creating applications. Or if you don't consider yourselves as such, then I would say that you are a kind of interface between them and us, those who benefit from your creations, and even more, we benefit from your generosity as your applications are accessible to all, i.e. free, for which you have our thanks and gratitude. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Satellite PC Card Receivers, Internet by Satellite
neumoDVB
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top