Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
What's On, Transponder and channel support
Transponders & channels
New NS2000 (NS3 / NS4) thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="moonbase" data-source="post: 1163822" data-attributes="member: 178786"><p>I carried out some tests on the SR lock threshold for an NS3 frequency and found it to be 0.0177 mcps</p><p>For example, Locked at SR of 34.2763 mcps, fails to lock at 34.2940 mcps.</p><p></p><p>I have yet to repeat the SR step test for an NS4 frequency but I expect the threshold to be tighter, requiring smaller step increments to achieve a lock.</p><p></p><p>The same step principle applies to the frequency but for this I think there is more tolerance?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="moonbase, post: 1163822, member: 178786"] I carried out some tests on the SR lock threshold for an NS3 frequency and found it to be 0.0177 mcps For example, Locked at SR of 34.2763 mcps, fails to lock at 34.2940 mcps. I have yet to repeat the SR step test for an NS4 frequency but I expect the threshold to be tighter, requiring smaller step increments to achieve a lock. The same step principle applies to the frequency but for this I think there is more tolerance? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
What's On, Transponder and channel support
Transponders & channels
New NS2000 (NS3 / NS4) thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
