Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lexzie" data-source="post: 1065704" data-attributes="member: 344918">Yes off course, I mean I have seen testing blind scan not finding anything or very little on sats where a lot transponders were active. So even the known transponders couldn't be found, so what unknown transponders weren't found? You'll never know. But I meant it as means of test. If a blindscan can't even find the already known signals what's the reliability in finding new/changed transponders?That's way to high. To bad if blindscan can't scan below 1000, but I can understand that that's difficult and can live with that.But in a manual scan a DM920 (which I believe has the same tunerchip?) could find as low as 285. (Astra 3B, 23.5°E, 12647 V, Antenne Düsseldorf).And how is the representation of the signal strength now? I believe in earlier softwareversions there were issues with that?It is necessary for fine-tuning a movable dish via vbox+actuator.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lexzie, post: 1065704, member: 344918"] Yes off course, I mean I have seen testing blind scan not finding anything or very little on sats where a lot transponders were active. So even the known transponders couldn't be found, so what unknown transponders weren't found? You'll never know. But I meant it as means of test. If a blindscan can't even find the already known signals what's the reliability in finding new/changed transponders? That's way to high. To bad if blindscan can't scan below 1000, but I can understand that that's difficult and can live with that. But in a manual scan a DM920 (which I believe has the same tunerchip?) could find as low as 285. (Astra 3B, 23.5°E, 12647 V, Antenne Düsseldorf). And how is the representation of the signal strength now? I believe in earlier softwareversions there were issues with that? It is necessary for fine-tuning a movable dish via vbox+actuator. [/QUOTE]

Verification