Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="stephan94" data-source="post: 1030263" data-attributes="member: 294032">HelloA comparison between the data which are supplied from the SF4008and which are given by the SX88 the.Everything with the DreamBoxEdit.In this area, the SX88 delivers less data and, moreover, some which are completely false.It has asked for an editor, is now at hand; but you have them really do not expect much.Here's an example.Audio PID are wrong (all 8191)System (DVB-S or S2) and false (all DVB-S)TSID and NID are also incorrect.For audio, it has already been reported to the Octagon,if what is reported, it does not write his right otherwise prefer.Anyway, you do not expect too much from a 75 € device, its performance exceeds even what other device that are much more expensive offer.This editor is only there have Disecq 1.2 Problem for people and want to edit the Satellite number.Also, I have a feeling that this is now dismounting Disecq 1.2 problem[ATTACH=full]111242[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="stephan94, post: 1030263, member: 294032"] Hello A comparison between the data which are supplied from the SF4008 and which are given by the SX88 the. Everything with the DreamBoxEdit. In this area, the SX88 delivers less data and, moreover, some which are completely false. It has asked for an editor, is now at hand; but you have them really do not expect much. Here's an example. Audio PID are wrong (all 8191) System (DVB-S or S2) and false (all DVB-S) TSID and NID are also incorrect. For audio, it has already been reported to the Octagon, if what is reported, it does not write his right otherwise prefer. Anyway, you do not expect too much from a 75 € device, its performance exceeds even what other device that are much more expensive offer. This editor is only there have Disecq 1.2 Problem for people and want to edit the Satellite number. Also, I have a feeling that this is now dismounting Disecq 1.2 problem [ATTACH=full]111242[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification