Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="stephan94" data-source="post: 1038945" data-attributes="member: 294032">you want to talk about the DisEqC 1.2 system?With Usals it works well.The problem with DisEqC 1,2, the satellite number is stored in the receiver and the corresponding number of pulse is stored in the engine.The problem (but it is not the only receiver that has this problem) it places the numbers of the satellites at random and when we change the receiver must start all over again from the beginning.This is actually a design problem for DisEqC 1.2.<img src="https://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/sad.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Sad    :(" data-shortname=":(" /></blockquote>