Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="william-1" data-source="post: 1040832" data-attributes="member: 193781">I rarely use the TM5402HD M3 as the video is very poor in comparison with the M1 &amp; M2 versions I did complain to Technomate so they added more video controls but it was still poor &amp; they never fixed the data base problems after a few weeks of use the M3 adds hundreds of dead transponders that is a nightmare when I compile satellite charts <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite12" alt="o_O" title="Er... what?&nbsp; &nbsp; o_O" loading="lazy" data-shortname="o_O" /> so I told them that I was not happy with the M3 as is made of cheap sourced parts in China &amp; full of data base errors that need to be sorted out but it seems that quality is not a priority at TM these days<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite9" alt=":eek:" title="Eek!&nbsp; &nbsp; :eek:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":eek:" />The M1 &amp; M2 were made of higher quality parts in Korea with very few data base problems so I use these to compile my TM5402HD channel lists,The support has now finished for these receivers that could have been much better the TM6902HD was probably the best receiver that they made,As for the SX88 the video is excellent the support is very good &amp; I will probably get the SX88+ to replace some of my older receivers <img src="https://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="william-1, post: 1040832, member: 193781"] I rarely use the TM5402HD M3 as the video is very poor in comparison with the M1 & M2 versions I did complain to Technomate so they added more video controls but it was still poor & they never fixed the data base problems after a few weeks of use the M3 adds hundreds of dead transponders that is a nightmare when I compile satellite charts o_O so I told them that I was not happy with the M3 as is made of cheap sourced parts in China & full of data base errors that need to be sorted out but it seems that quality is not a priority at TM these days:eek: The M1 & M2 were made of higher quality parts in Korea with very few data base problems so I use these to compile my TM5402HD channel lists, The support has now finished for these receivers that could have been much better the TM6902HD was probably the best receiver that they made, As for the SX88 the video is excellent the support is very good & I will probably get the SX88+ to replace some of my older receivers :) [/QUOTE]

Verification