Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jeallen01" data-source="post: 1104148" data-attributes="member: 176704">I know this is not the &quot;basic SX88&quot; thread but I would suspect that, in the following respect, they are probably similar, and so I wonder if someone can answer this question:Some days ago [USER=415764]@manikm909[/USER] posted that there is a transponder on 63W (not that I would actually be able to receive that sat here!) and gave the parameters as 11505/H/21000 - but when I try to add a transponder with those numbers for a new sat at 63W in the SX88, I get an &quot;Invalid TP&quot; message.I have also seen the same message on a few previous occasions when I have tried to add new transponders on some of the &quot;more obscure&quot; (in the UK, at least) sats.What I find &quot;puzzling&quot; is that those transponder parameters are well within the ranges that the SX88 can (and generally does) handle with no issues - the only thing that I can possibly think of is that there is &quot;something&quot; buried in the f/w which is causing this???Therefore does anyone know why this sort of thing might be happening??</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jeallen01, post: 1104148, member: 176704"] I know this is not the "basic SX88" thread but I would suspect that, in the following respect, they are probably similar, and so I wonder if someone can answer this question: Some days ago [USER=415764]@manikm909[/USER] posted that there is a transponder on 63W (not that I would actually be able to receive that sat here!) and gave the parameters as 11505/H/21000 - but when I try to add a transponder with those numbers for a new sat at 63W in the SX88, I get an "Invalid TP" message. I have also seen the same message on a few previous occasions when I have tried to add new transponders on some of the "more obscure" (in the UK, at least) sats. What I find "puzzling" is that those transponder parameters are well within the ranges that the SX88 can (and generally does) handle with no issues - the only thing that I can possibly think of is that there is "something" buried in the f/w which is causing this??? Therefore does anyone know why this sort of thing might be happening?? [/QUOTE]

Verification