Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Sky Digital BSkyB, Freesat & Saorsat support forum
Sky & Freesat fringe reception
PLL Lnbs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Old Fred" data-source="post: 22930"><p>I wouldn't put too much faith in noise figures. I've read reports that say, for example, that the Manhattan MTI 0.6dB LNB works better (for Astra 2D) than the Invacom 0.3 or the Syntec 0.3. And consider these points:-</p><p></p><p>1. It's very difficult to measure such low noise figures.</p><p>2. They are measured under laboratory conditions with "perfect" 75 Ohm cable simulation. In practice, "75 Ohm" cable can be anywhere from 65 to 85 Ohm (worse if you kink it!)</p><p>3. It's not feasible to measure noise for every LNB across the entire two frequency bands (high and low). So the manufacturers make a couple of "spot" measurements at specific frequencies and "extrapolate" (= guess) that those measurements are "typical" for the whole spectrum. And they measure only a few LNBs in each batch of thousands.</p><p>4. Even Swedish Microwave *allegedly* have only a dozen little graphs which they print and put in LNB boxes at random! (I don't know if this is true but it makes sense). But at least their graphs really are "typical".</p><p></p><p>As for "PLL" (Phase Locked Loop), I don't know of any other way to establish an accurate and virtually drift-free Local Oscillator frequency, so I guess ALL LNBs must use a "PLL".</p><p></p><p>Kinda like boasting "bread made with REAL flour!"</p><p>As if there was some other kind of bread.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Old Fred, post: 22930"] I wouldn't put too much faith in noise figures. I've read reports that say, for example, that the Manhattan MTI 0.6dB LNB works better (for Astra 2D) than the Invacom 0.3 or the Syntec 0.3. And consider these points:- 1. It's very difficult to measure such low noise figures. 2. They are measured under laboratory conditions with "perfect" 75 Ohm cable simulation. In practice, "75 Ohm" cable can be anywhere from 65 to 85 Ohm (worse if you kink it!) 3. It's not feasible to measure noise for every LNB across the entire two frequency bands (high and low). So the manufacturers make a couple of "spot" measurements at specific frequencies and "extrapolate" (= guess) that those measurements are "typical" for the whole spectrum. And they measure only a few LNBs in each batch of thousands. 4. Even Swedish Microwave *allegedly* have only a dozen little graphs which they print and put in LNB boxes at random! (I don't know if this is true but it makes sense). But at least their graphs really are "typical". As for "PLL" (Phase Locked Loop), I don't know of any other way to establish an accurate and virtually drift-free Local Oscillator frequency, so I guess ALL LNBs must use a "PLL". Kinda like boasting "bread made with REAL flour!" As if there was some other kind of bread. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Sky Digital BSkyB, Freesat & Saorsat support forum
Sky & Freesat fringe reception
PLL Lnbs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top