Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="T_G" data-source="post: 585093" data-attributes="member: 175083">HiOf course I will only endorse this box if it has the EMUS, CS and motor control - this is the reason I did not buy the Kathrein for instance (lack of diseqc 1.2). I believe that Duolabs know EXACTLY what is needed for this box (I.E. cam, CS etc), after all you would be an idiot not noticing the impact Dreambox has made in the market. So they come up with a box that has a diablo cam built in (which everyone knows what it is for), and high speed wifi for even better and easier connection to the internet. If after all the effort of producing the hardware they are not going to supply the software, I would be very very surprised. It is true that the Dreambox has a superb support, the Gemini team does provide a very good image service - but don't forget that when the Dreamboxes first appeared the images were very unstable, streaming was not possible and recording to your computer only a dream. It took a while, but I think that if the qbox turns out to be &quot;good&quot; there will be images produced.I don't need 12 images to be honest, I have been using Gemini images for 2 years or more - if the Qbox has one or two good working images, that will be enough for me - it is not a reason to pay 1000 Euros and more just because there are 7 different images. At the end of the day I only got one set of eyes <img src="https://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" data-shortname=":)" />As you noticed I am not telling everyone go buy this box today - wait until the software has appeared - but one thing is for sure: I for one will not pay double or more than the current price for a Qbox - I will continue to use an SD box until a reasonable pricved HD box is on the market. If it is the Qbox, I will be very happy. If not, something else will pop up - and be sure I will tell you about it <img src="https://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="T_G, post: 585093, member: 175083"] Hi Of course I will only endorse this box if it has the EMUS, CS and motor control - this is the reason I did not buy the Kathrein for instance (lack of diseqc 1.2). I believe that Duolabs know EXACTLY what is needed for this box (I.E. cam, CS etc), after all you would be an idiot not noticing the impact Dreambox has made in the market. So they come up with a box that has a diablo cam built in (which everyone knows what it is for), and high speed wifi for even better and easier connection to the internet. If after all the effort of producing the hardware they are not going to supply the software, I would be very very surprised. It is true that the Dreambox has a superb support, the Gemini team does provide a very good image service - but don't forget that when the Dreamboxes first appeared the images were very unstable, streaming was not possible and recording to your computer only a dream. It took a while, but I think that if the qbox turns out to be "good" there will be images produced. I don't need 12 images to be honest, I have been using Gemini images for 2 years or more - if the Qbox has one or two good working images, that will be enough for me - it is not a reason to pay 1000 Euros and more just because there are 7 different images. At the end of the day I only got one set of eyes :) As you noticed I am not telling everyone go buy this box today - wait until the software has appeared - but one thing is for sure: I for one will not pay double or more than the current price for a Qbox - I will continue to use an SD box until a reasonable pricved HD box is on the market. If it is the Qbox, I will be very happy. If not, something else will pop up - and be sure I will tell you about it :) [/QUOTE]

Verification